Staff Reports
Joe Biden, in his usual style, went to a historic AME church in Texas on Juneteenth, but instead of bringing clarity, he only added to his reputation for confusing, slurred speeches. It’s another example of liberal hypocrisy at its finest—a former president attempting to take shots at his predecessor, Donald Trump, but only highlighting his own inability to make coherent arguments.
Biden tried to discuss Juneteenth and the supposed ongoing struggle for voting rights, but his message got lost somewhere in his muddled delivery. Liberals are always quick to accuse the right of trying to erase history, but it’s ironic coming from Biden. Instead of addressing real issues, he’s focused on renaming military bases and conjuring up divisive narratives. This is a classic maneuver from the left—distract, deflect, and when all else fails, just mumble something about Trump.
He tried to bolster his credibility by referring to his past roles and visits to Africa, as though that somehow makes him an authority on American freedom. The truth is, when it comes to defending American values, Biden falls short. His administration is more concerned with pandering and symbolic gestures than with taking any real action.
The left loves to talk about moral stains and historical injustices, yet they continually ignore the present-day problems facing our nation, problems that their policies have exacerbated. The left’s prescription is always more of the same: government control masked as social justice. They champion a federal holiday as if that alone will solve deep-rooted issues. Meanwhile, Americans are struggling under the weight of current incompetence, not the ghosts of the past.
Biden’s attempts to attack Trump during his speech only proved one thing clearly—he misses the leadership and decisiveness that Trump brought to the table. Maybe it’s hard for liberals to admit, but under Trump, America was being put first. So here’s the real question: Isn’t it time we had leaders who focused on real issues rather than just rewriting history to fit a flawed narrative?
