Staff Reports
In a display of classic political posturing, former National Security Advisor John Bolton found himself in a twist after President Donald Trump revoked his Secret Service protection following Trump’s inauguration as the 47th president. One would think that a guy with Bolton’s résumé—having once held high office under the Trump administration—would have some gratitude, but instead, he promptly aired his grievances on CNN. Perhaps he failed to grasp that the new administration isn’t obligated to coddle disgruntled ex-employees.
Bolton expressed his disappointment, conveying that he was having “better days” and insinuating Trump’s character—or supposed lack thereof—was to blame. Now, Bolton, known for his hawkish stance on foreign policy, seems to have traded tact for theatrics. Instead of quietly packing his bags after a rocky departure in 2019, he’s been engaged in a public tirade, bringing up the fact that President Biden had previously extended his protection out of “recognition” of the threats he faced. It’s almost as if being in a job doesn’t come with a lifetime security package.
WATCH: John Bolton Lashes Out On CNN After Trump Revokes His Security Detailhttps://t.co/xnd4MDX7Q1
— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) January 23, 2025
The irony continues when Bolton provides a lesson in American protectionism. He insists that the Biden administration didn’t just find him grumbling about foreign policy critiques too funny to ignore; rather, it was simply “not permissible” for a rogue state like Iran to target anyone expressing dissenting opinions. One wonders how sincerely he believes in the existence of such a principle when his own tenure seemed to ignite more flames than extinguish them. Apparently, serving under a president who was tough on Iran and North Korea didn’t learn him anything about risk assessment.
Trump, however, exercised the ultimate prerogative of any leader: determining the length of security detail for those who serve in their administration. When questioned about his decision, Trump didn’t mince words. His view was straightforward—nothing lasts forever, not even Bolton’s need for protection denied by the former president himself. Protecting someone who can’t stop criticizing you sounds like the political version of letting a kid have candy on Halloween. Why would Trump go the extra mile to safeguard someone who seems less interested in national security and more in personal gripes?
Bolton’s golden moment in the spotlight quickly shifted to disappointment, but not shock, regarding Trump’s actions. He casually noted that Biden was far more generous when it came to extending protection, which inadvertently accentuates a critical question: does cheering from the sidelines for another administration indicate future loyalty? It seems more like asking for the ‘do-over’ card after a terrible game. Having written a tell-all book and taken a few swings at Trump since leaving office, it appears Bolton is perfectly fine stirring the pot, as long as he remains at the center of attention—preferably while avoiding any danger himself.
The saga between Trump and Bolton reveals not just a clash of personalities, but the stark reality of post-administration life. With tensions brewing and back-and-forth quips echoing through media channels, one thing is clear: the only ones truly experiencing a case of “frustration” are the voters trying to navigate the circus of former officials trading barbs. All the while, crucial issues of national security remain at the forefront, but Bolton seems determined to make it about himself instead.
