Staff Reports
When will the world wake up to the double standards and outright hypocrisy of globalist forces? Now, we’ve got China, of all countries, attempting to lecture the United States on what’s legal and what’s not. The irony is stifling. Here’s China, where the rule of law barely scratches the surface of governance, daring to say the U.S. acted unlawfully by seizing an oil tanker circumventing sanctions. This vessel, fluttering a Russian flag, had its last port of call in Venezuela. Doesn’t that paint a clear picture of what game is afoot?
This isn’t just about a single oil tanker. It’s about the sanctimonious audacity of China, screeching foul play like a kid caught with his hands in the cookie jar. Let’s talk about “international law”—we all know that for China, it’s a fluid set of principles that apply only when they manage to twist them to suit their needs. The real danger here is that their rhetoric is designed to make the U.S. look like the villain, deflecting attention from their profiteering agenda.
https://twitter.com/RigidDemocracy/status/2009314542246089047
It’s important to consider who’s really at fault here. The U.S. has sanctions against hostile regimes for a reason. Countries like Venezuela and Russia don’t exactly have clean slates. They’re enablers of chaos, backed by a communist powerhouse that’s keen to unsettle global stability to expand its own influence. And let’s not forget how liberals and globalists turn a blind eye to these transgressions, choosing instead to take the moral high ground only when it serves their narrative.
But here’s the deal: America must stand firm. We can’t buckle every time there’s an outcry from authoritarian states that prioritize their interests over basic human freedoms. The world acts as if sanction evasion can’t be punished if it’s done cleverly enough. But if the U.S. doesn’t enforce its own sanctions, they become nothing more than suggestions—reducing American influence to a shadow of its former self.
Let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about lawfulness; it’s about maintaining control over strategic resources and economic power. China’s cry is the sound of desperation as its assembly-line plans come unraveled. So who will America choose to appease? The interests of its own citizens, or the flattering demands of a rising adversary?
