Staff Reports
Abby Phillip from CNN demonstrated once again that when it comes to defending Democrats, particularly Vice President Kamala Harris, she is willing to spin the facts like a professional contortionist. During a recent live panel discussion centered around the presidential race, Phillip’s attempts to gloss over Harris’s past statements on fracking backfired spectacularly, exposing the lengths to which some in the media will go to protect their political allies.
Phillip has steadily established herself within the liberal confines of CNN, where the bar for journalistic integrity has plummeted. It seems that in order to thrive there, one must embrace a version of reality that frequently favors Democrats while ignoring inconvenient truths. This has been particularly true since Harris’s ascension as the Democratic presidential nominee, leading to more leniency from networks like CNN regarding her questionable assertions.
During the panel, Phillip attempted to refute criticism of Harris’s previous anti-fracking stance, asserting that the vice president had changed her position by 2020. However, this assertion drew immediate pushback, even from fellow panelists who typically reside on the far-left side of the political spectrum. The ferocity of the disagreement underscored not just Phillip’s glaring misstep, but also how deeply ingrained the disconnect is between media narratives and the reality of political figures’ statements.
One must wonder why a supposed objective journalist feels the need to rush to Harris’s defense in the first place. The facts are clear: during her earlier campaign for the presidency, Harris made bold proclamations against fracking, promising to eliminate it entirely. She has never presented a coherent argument explaining how such a drastic reversal took place as she now occupies a position of power alongside Joe Biden. Phillip’s insistence on portraying a narrative of change is more reflective of a negligence in journalistic responsibility than an honest attempt to inform viewers.
CNN's Abby Phillip Fibs So Hard for Kamala Harris That Her Own Panel Lambasts Herhttps://t.co/y19YGTnefq
— RedState (@RedState) September 12, 2024
The incident also reflects a broader troubling trend in how media outlets manage discussions about Democratic figures. Whenever a leftist agenda item is called into question, many hosts leap to defend it without providing the context or clarity necessary for an informed public discourse. Phillip’s behavior is reminiscent of moderators from other networks who have attempted to fact-check Republican claims while conveniently ignoring the inconsistencies in the positions held by leftist candidates.
Ultimately, while some liberal panelists may choose to indulge in Phillip’s elaborate fabrications, it is refreshing to witness even self-identified progressives call out the dishonesty within their ranks. Harris’s past commitment to banning fracking is not a mere talking point; it is a significant part of her political identity that has not evolved to match her current position. And as these discussions unfold, it becomes increasingly clear that the divide between media portrayal and reality is not going to be bridged anytime soon—especially when personalities like Abby Phillip are at the helm.
