Staff Reports
In the latest display of its usual bias, CNN embarked on an ill-fated mission to fact-check President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress. While the president passionately pointed out the astonishing waste of taxpayer dollars under the Biden administration, CNN was evidently more intent on reshaping the narrative than on presenting the truth. One of Trump’s most eyebrow-raising examples of this budgetary absurdity was the reported $8 million dedicated to transgender studies on mice, a claim that had the network scrambling to maintain its credibility.
CNN’s Deidre McPhillips tried to counter the president’s assertion, claiming only $500,000 had been allocated for similar research on monkeys. However, when the White House promptly debunked her argument, proving Trump was correct, CNN faced considerable embarrassment. This situation exemplified the network’s desperate attempt to fact-check what was undeniably a glaring example of government overspending.
🚨TRUMP: "$8M for making mice transgender. This is real." 💀 pic.twitter.com/JgxVWsrJY6
— Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) March 5, 2025
In a press release following Trump’s speech, the White House expounded on the myriad ways taxpayer funds were being misused, highlighting the $8 million for programs that turned mice into subjects of gender experiments. The response was a strong reminder that accountability in government spending should transcend political lines, and yet here was CNN, neck-deep in damage control after their smeared attempt to protect the Biden administration’s expenditures.
Official grants from the National Institutes of Health were laid bare, showcasing a staggering list of projects that appeared to serve no real purpose or benefit to the average American. From hormone therapy experiments to studies on reproductive consequences in mice, the total expenditure reached over $8 million, putting Trump’s claims in stark focus and leaving CNN’s credibility hanging by a thread.
In a stunning twist of irony, as CNN attempted to salvage its reputation, it shifted its stance to state that Trump’s remarks “need context.” This vague and evasive phrase is exactly what one would expect from a network deeply invested in a narrative that often ignores the glaring absurdities of government allocations. The real question remains: how can taxpayers be expected to support studies involving mice in experiments that sidestep the pressing issues Americans face? With the integrity of real journalism at stake, CNN has unwittingly showcased its preference for political correctness over factual reporting, leaving viewers with more questions than answers.
