Staff Reports
In a shocking turn of events, the Democratic judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have once again prioritized political correctness over parental rights. They reinstated California’s controversial “gender secrecy” policies that shield students’ gender identities from their own parents. This decision not only undermines the authority of families but also reinforces the idea that the state knows better than parents about how to raise their own children.
A few brave voices in the judiciary have been trying to push back against this madness. U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez initially ruled against these harmful policies, suggesting that parents deserve to know if their children are struggling with issues related to gender identity. He pointed out that the policies obstruct communication between teachers and parents, potentially leaving families in the dark about crucial matters concerning their kids. But here comes the liberal judiciary, stepping in to maintain a veil of secrecy that puts vulnerable students even further at risk.
https://twitter.com/RickyDoggin/status/2007251118703907043
The three-judge panel, composed entirely of judicial appointees from Democratic administrations, has thrown Benitez’s sound reasoning out the window. Their ruling claims to protect students, but what it really does is protect a dangerous ideology that prioritizes feelings over facts and individual rights. By suppressing parental knowledge and involvement, these judges are siding with bureaucratic nonsense rather than the best interests of families.
The Democratic judges express concerns about the legitimacy of Benitez’s class certification of affected teachers and parents. They argue that the “injunction is too vague” and that he overstepped when he granted parents the right to be informed of their children’s “gender incongruence.” In essence, they prefer a world where governmental institutions dictate personal matters—where children can share intimate details with school staff while their parents remain clueless. It’s a mockery of the family unit and an affront to common sense.
This case isn’t just about one family’s privacy; it reflects a broader agenda—an attempt by the left to normalize the idea that parents have no role in their children’s upbringing. In a delusional bid to promote an increasingly radical agenda, these judges are playing politics rather than serving justice. Family values and parental rights are under siege, and liberals are using every tool at their disposal to further their globalist vision and undermine American culture.
As we move forward, Americans must ask themselves: How did we get here? It’s high time to push back against this tyranny, where judges appointed by liberals act as gatekeepers of our rights. The future of our children depends on defending parental authority and giving families the power to make crucial decisions in their children’s lives. We can’t let California be the example of what a country devoid of family values looks like. This battle for our children’s futures is far from over. Will we allow our rights to slip away quietly, or will we stand up and fight back?
