Staff Reports
The Democratic Party is experiencing a civil war of monumental proportions, fueled by the recent catastrophic defeat of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. Observers like Jeet Heer have remarked that the alarm bells are ringing, as the party remnants engage in a post-mortem of their failed campaign. Instead of acknowledging the unmitigated disaster of running a campaign devoid of substance, Democratic strategists are busy spinning elaborate tales of a “flawless” operation. One might wonder if the party’s internal narrative reflects a desperate need for reality checks or merely an unwillingness to look in the mirror.
Heer aptly points out that the loss to Trump wasn’t just a fluke; it was an inevitable consequence of the bad decisions made behind closed doors by none other than Joe Biden and his team. The only thing worse than Harris’s effort, which was a marvel of vacuity, would have been if she had actually thrown meaningful ideas into the mix. The Trump campaign, relying on some exquisite advertising strategies and a newfound appreciation for free speech thanks to Elon Musk’s X, managed to remind voters of Harris’s controversial record, leaving her campaign floundering for relevance.
Today in the Great Democrat Civil War…https://t.co/F0t4PmfIQS
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) December 11, 2024
The aftermath of this electoral debacle saw not only Harris hit the floor but also Democratic heavyweights getting knocked out in Senate races. In an incredible display of electoral gymnastics, Democrats narrowly avoided more significant losses, thanks in no small part to the dubious tactics employed in California’s congressional races. The party’s insistence on embracing its own failures has led to a collective shrug when confronted with the reality of their dwindling support.
There’s a certain irony in Heer’s critique of Democratic complacency, especially when he acknowledges the unyielding self-satisfaction that permeates party circles. A comparison to past Democratic calamities, such as Mike Dukakis’s crushing defeat in 1988, reveals that Democrats have evolved little in terms of accountability. While Dukakis was swiftly exiled from national politics after his debacle, today’s Democrats seem to be gearing up for more radical excursions, rather than necessary introspection. This raises the question: have the Democrats learned anything from their losses, or are they simply stubbornly forging ahead in their misguided pursuits?
The shining glory days of moderate populists, such as Bill Clinton and the Democratic Leadership Council, feel like a distant memory in the current landscape where radicalism reigns. Those in charge today — often constituted by the Young Turks who emerged during Obama’s administration — appear to have an affection for the high-octane ideologies without realizing that such a direction diminishes their appeal among mainstream Americans. The hopeful wish is that Democrats might look back to those times of moderation for guidance, yet with the current leadership at the helm, it seems that this is little more than a pipe dream as the party marches bridal down the radical path.
