Staff Reports
In the latest chapter of far-left lunacy, Don Lemon has managed to stir the pot once again, this time urging people to arm themselves against federal law enforcement officers. It seems Mr. Lemon, grasping for any ounce of attention, jumped on a little-watched show, “The Left Hook,” to make what can only be described as reckless and illegal suggestions. He wants folks, particularly Black and Brown citizens and people of all stripes (including Indian/Mexican Americans), to purchase firearms and be ready to use them as self-defense against what he perceives as unwarranted law enforcement actions. That, dear readers, isn’t just irresponsible babble. It’s a criminal act.
Now, let’s be clear. It’s a crime to promote violence against government officials. This isn’t some petty misdemeanor we’re talking about here; it’s a felony with serious consequences. So, while Don Lemon imagines himself a warrior for what he perceives as justice, he’s actually inviting legal chaos and potential harm. When you cross the line from freedom of speech into incitement of violence, that’s not bravery or justice; it’s pure folly. And let’s be honest, Mr. Lemon, shouldn’t you know better than to make such outrageous comments on air?
Our Constitution’s Second Amendment ensures citizens have the right to bear arms primarily for self-defense and protection against tyranny. However, when Mr. Lemon suggests that citizens should wield firearms against what he sees as unlawful arrests by agents, it crosses into dangerous territory. These law enforcement officers aren’t tyrants. They’re executing U.S. law. Apparently, Don Lemon misunderstands not only the Second Amendment but who it’s applicable to. By advocating responses for perceived injustice, he once more proves how disconnected he is from the reality of law and order.
Then there’s the notion that no one can be “illegal.” Let’s clear this up. Yes, crossing the border without permission might be classified as a misdemeanor on the first offense. But a misdemeanor is still illegal. By brushing off these acts as merely trivial, Don Lemon exposes a fundamental flaw in his reasoning, or lack thereof. He trivializes the law and dilutes the seriousness of illegal entry, all the while dismissing the diligence of those pursuing legal pathways to citizenship.
In the end, Mr. Lemon’s misguided diatribe serves as a reminder of just how off-course the progressive narrative can drift. It’s a storyline riddled with hypocrisy, where crimes become inconsequential if they fit the right political agenda. Unfortunately for Don Lemon, American justice isn’t ruled by such a narrative. One can only hope that someday he and his ilk will grasp that advocating for responses for perceived rights isn’t just absurd—it’s downright dangerous. Expecting accountability from those who stoke chaos is our right, and we won’t be backing down anytime soon.
