Elon Musk is back in the headlines, and it’s not just because he named a kid something that sounds like a password. Musk, the chief of DOGE, has slapped a shiny new savings tracker on the U.S. Debt Clock, boasting an impressive—if not the stuff of dreams—$90.3 billion in potential savings. He’s eyeing an audacious goal: a full trillion slashed from the federal budget this year, which, by his calculations, means removing roughly $4 billion a day. Could President Donald Trump’s early days in office, largely spent on inaugural selfies, have been the only time in history that taxpayers got a brief reprieve from the rapidly spinning wheel of government spending? It remains to be seen, but if Washington’s past is any indicator, the pursuit of saving other people’s money is typically as elusive as a yeti in a blizzard.
The real comedy here lies in the utter confusion (and perhaps despair) of those who’ve made a career off “other people’s money.” The bureaucratic black hole that is the federal budget—boondoggle known as USAID—is a classic example. Initially designed for altruism, it’s been reduced to a $40 billion slush fund, filling the back pockets of Washington elites faster than one could say “wasteful spending.” Staggeringly, almost all the funds earmarked for actual Haitian relief got lost, with a shockingly low 2% actually making it to those who need it. Apparently, $4 billion earmarked to help needy folks materialized instead as nourishing Wagyu dinners for the D.C. elite. Who knew charity work was a fine dining affair?
Attention shifts to the so-called “entitlements” which, rather than being synonymous with social welfare that citizens should earn through taxes, have become synonymous with the ravenous appetites of bureaucrats. With a staggering $2.7 trillion going to fraudulent payments over the last two decades, one can’t help but sense a collective shrug from those in power. The real crux of the issue? It isn’t their money that’s getting flushed down the drain—it’s the hard-earned cash of American taxpayers who, as far as Washington is concerned, may as well be at a casino on a permanent night out.
The recent reactions coming from the Left about Musk’s endeavors conjure up images of a spoiled child throwing a tantrum. Democratic representatives appear to be gearing up for everything but a friendly discourse on budget cuts, veering dangerously close to apocalyptic talk about “street fights” should they find their cookie jar cracked open and its contents pillaged. It’s almost as if they’re operating under the impression that the government’s coffers are an endless wellspring of cash to be siphoned away without consequence.
The End of Other People's Money https://t.co/R288xdVov7
— Dr. Kenneth Warner (@wrestlerkw7) February 14, 2025
The roots of this problem dig deep into the very fabric of government expansion, largely thanks to FDR paving the road to bureaucratic bloat without as much as a single amendment to the Constitution. While he may have pretended to care about taxpayer dollars, the system as we know it has evolved into a bureaucratic beast that is all too happy to feed on the wealth of hardworking Americans. The idea that Washington could ever be transformed back into something resembling accountability and efficiency feels more like a fairy tale than a possibility.
News flash for Democrats: Your days of casually munching on the wealth of others may be numbered. Thanks to the abundance of new media, the previous stranglehold on information by the legacy media is wilting. Polls show that voters are awakening to the necessity of cutting government waste—people are indeed sick and tired of funding a bureaucratic monstrosity that treats other people’s money like a personal ATM. Democrats might want to heed that mood, but the vision of reclaiming their once firm grip on power, without genuinely altering their policies, seems as fantastical as a unicorn riding a rainbow.
The political landscape is shifting, and for those aligned with the ethos of “it’s not my money,” the plugs might be getting pulled from the fiscal buffet they’ve feasted off for far too long. As the tide turns, it’ll be fascinating to see if a reformed approach can be adopted or if they’ll simply default to their roots—blinking in confusion while clutching empty wallets and tangled plans.