Staff Reports
FBI Director Christopher Wray’s latest performance before Congress has sparked more than just a few raised eyebrows. After hinting that former President Donald Trump might not have been hit by the gunman’s bullet, a liberal media outlet has seized the opportunity to stir the pot. Under a sensational headline suggesting Trump might be exaggerating his close call, Newsweek has decided to run wild with this narrative, lending credence to the age-old adage—when in doubt, attack.
Wray, in a testimony that seemed less decisive and more of a verbal gymnastics show, stated that it was still unclear if Trump was actually struck in the ear by a round from the gunman’s AR-15 or if he simply sustained damage from flying debris, potentially from the teleprompter. The real kicker came straight from Trump himself, who, immediately after the incident, declared on Truth Social that he had been shot in the “upper part of my right ear.” What could possibly be more conclusive than that? But in the twisted world of leftist media, facts are just stepping stones to further misinformation.
🚨BREAKING NEWS: A prominent liberal outlet raises questions about whether President Trump was actually shot. Read the shocking revelations and FBI Director's comments here: https://t.co/7q3Tkn2BLM Don't miss out! #Trump #news #FBI #breaking
— Patriot911 (@Patriot911News) July 25, 2024
Dr. Ronny Jackson, Trump’s physician, took a sun-drenched detour into reality, confirming that the former president was mere fractions away from a grisly fate. He clarified that Trump was grazed by a rifle round alarmingly close to the side of his head. Yet, rather than taking this straightforward diagnosis at face value, Newsweek opted to entertain the notion that Trump is simply embellishing the horror of the event to juice his poll numbers. Because, of course, nothing says “I’m not running for president” quite like a brush with death.
During the House oversight hearing, Rep. Kevin Kiley pushed Wray for clarity on how close the bullet came to taking Trump out. As political theater unfolded, Wray’s responses felt like a riddle wrapped in an enigma, leaving everyone scratching their heads. His indecision prompted further questions about the mysterious trajectory of the bullets, almost sounding as if he were narrating a suspenseful detective story instead of addressing a serious issue of national security.
It seems Wray’s future is as shaky as the security that allowed the deranged 20-year-old gunman to launch his attack. Just days prior, Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle had resigned after the security mess that unfolded, compelling Wray to pledge that he would be working “tirelessly” to get to the bottom of this fiasco. This isn’t just a matter of political intrigue; it’s a pressing concern about how someone could evade capture while perching on a roof, droning in the shadows, and taking aim at a former president. Instead of focusing on the severe shortcomings of the security detail, liberal outlets are fixated on discrediting Trump, as if watching the nation’s leaders put their lives on the line for their constituents were a mere soap opera.
