Staff Reports
Hamas is in an unprecedented state of desperation, openly reaching out to President Donald Trump in a dramatic bid for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza. This sudden appeal marks a stunning reversal for the group responsible for the brutal massacre on October 7, 2023—a massacre that shocked the world and drew international condemnation. Now, confronted by the relentless pressure of Israeli defense operations and Trump’s unyielding demands, Hamas has declared a willingness to release half of its remaining hostages if Trump can guarantee a pause in hostilities. This gesture, relayed through intermediaries, speaks volumes about the dire straits Hamas now finds itself in.
For years, Western politicians and media outlets excused or downplayed Hamas’s atrocities. Yet today, the terrorist organization is finally forced to acknowledge reality: it’s losing badly, both on the battlefield and in the court of public opinion. Trump’s approach—insisting that all hostages must be released, and delivering what he called a “final warning”—has left Hamas cut off from its traditional sources of diplomatic cover. Unlike his liberal predecessors, Trump has offered nothing but blunt consequences and steadfast support for Israel’s right to self-defense. The sudden willingness of Hamas to negotiate demonstrates that strength, not appeasement, is what brings bad actors to the table.
Hamas has reportedly written to President Trump, proposing a 60-day ceasefire in return for releasing half of the hostages in Gaza. pic.twitter.com/SwhvA6kyXS
— Naija (@Naija_PR) September 23, 2025
Meanwhile, globalist powers like France are once again pushing tired, failed solutions. The French and their international partners call for an “International Stabilization Mission,”—which is nothing more than a fancy way to undermine Israel’s sovereignty and force premature “peace” on terms favorable to Hamas. Many of these same countries have rushed to recognize a Palestinian state while ignoring the millions traumatized by Islamic terrorism. It’s more hypocrisy from the self-appointed “moral leaders” of the West, who consistently put ideology before security and common sense.
All eyes are now on Trump as he prepares to present a plan for ending the conflict to Arab and Muslim leaders at the United Nations. Unlike the weak-kneed “multilateral” efforts championed by his European counterparts, Trump’s track record and rhetoric make clear that Hamas cannot blackmail the Free World with partial gestures. Trump insists on the total release of hostages and an end to terror—not the symbolic compromises that have long plagued Middle Eastern diplomacy. Americans, weary of foreign entanglements and empty promises, are ready for true leadership and lasting security.
Once again, the contrast is plain to see: while the left lobbies for appeasement, only a posture of resolve and principle can deliver real peace. The world will soon discover whether Trump’s firm stand finally breaks the cycle of violence and brings overdue justice to the Middle East—or if international elites will once again snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Either way, this turning point exposes what commonsense conservatives have known for years: strength and clarity—not weakness and equivocation—bring results.
