The recent performance of Vice President Kamala Harris on Fox News has raised eyebrows, particularly concerning her insistence that Joe Biden is fit for the presidency. This dramatic episode has evoked memories of the Watergate hearings, where pivotal questions about knowledge and timing were at the heart of the inquiry. The public is left to ponder: when did Harris first become aware of Biden’s apparent mental decline?
During a rare moment of pushback from Bret Baier, Harris was forced into a corner on this sticky subject. She had previously claimed Biden was sharp and in control, only to deflect as soon as the topic of his declining mental faculties came up. In a campaign where attacking Trump is the headline act, her performance under tough questioning fell flat, showcasing a concerning evasiveness. It was humorous, if not alarming, to witness her try to maintain the facade that Biden was aces when the whole country has been watching the man struggle for coherence.
Your thoughts? Watch: Commie Commala Harris Scrambles, Tries to Escape Questions About Biden During Tense Interview Moment: What did the vice president know, and when did she know it? It’s a spin on the old line from the Watergate hearings — and… https://t.co/qsOozw7G2H pic.twitter.com/fhlIimGL3a
— NahBabyNah #Trump (@NahBabyNah) October 17, 2024
Baier’s inquiry was straightforward—what did she notice about Biden’s cognitive abilities? Instead of providing a candid response, Harris skillfully dodged the question, opting to prattle on about Trump’s supposed mental instability. It’s almost as if she had a checklist for deflection: point a finger, change the subject, rinse and repeat. One has to wonder if Harris is merely buying time until the inevitable can no longer be denied—the man is not all there, and the Democratic ticket feels more like the Titanic than the HMS Victory.
Adding comic relief to the political circus, Harris pointed out that Biden isn’t on the ballot, as if that’s supposed to absolve her from accountability regarding his mental state. The fact that she seemed caught off guard by the question, which has been in the air for months, suggests that she hasn’t been living in reality. Her continual insistence on Biden’s competence, even as figures like George Clooney publicly question it, provides ample evidence that either she’s in denial or part of the cover-up team.
The bigger picture here reveals an administration scrambling to maintain appearances in the face of undeniable decline. Harris, who has avoided hard questions like a cat avoids a bath, was forced to confront the facts during Baier’s interview. The takeaway? An unelected official has been keeping things afloat while her boss appears to sink deeper into the fog of confusion—not exactly a reassuring scenario for Americans looking for strong leadership.
As Harris continues to throw Trump under the bus to distract from Biden’s less-than-stellar state, it’s clear that the Democratic strategy hinges on deflection rather than addressing the elephant in the room. If anyone thought the 2024 election would be smooth sailing for the Democrats, they might want to recalibrate their expectations. While Harris may skillfully sidestep questions about Biden, voters are unlikely to overlook the glaring reality of an administration that appears to be hanging by a thread.