Staff Reports
The political circus continues as Vice President Kamala Harris prepares to deliver an address in Georgia, where she will point the finger at former President Donald Trump for the deaths of two women in the state, linking them—dubiously—to the state’s recent abortion laws. It appears that the art of deflection is alive and well, particularly when it comes to scrutinizing the consequences of progressive policies.
Georgia has implemented a law that prohibits abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. In a dramatic twist typical of the left, Harris will utilize the narratives surrounding the deaths to call for a restoration of federal abortion rights. Conveniently, her claims are largely built on insights from ProPublica, a publication that has earned its stripes as a liberal mouthpiece—one can almost hear the applause from the echo chamber in the background.
A whole campaign built on hoaxes. https://t.co/bJZnIwm9aI
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) September 19, 2024
The specifics around the two tragic cases are murky at best. In one instance, Amber Thurman died of sepsis following an incomplete medication abortion, having waited over 20 hours for medical care. ProPublica quickly seized this moment, insinuating that her hospital’s hesitance to treat her stemmed from fears of violating the new abortion law. The reality is far less simple. Medical professionals were caught between a rock and a hard place, but Harris’s narrative will undoubtedly simplify it for the audience, who are meant to see this as a chilling consequence of “Trump’s America.”
Then there is Candi Miller, whose unfortunate demise comes with a twist; she sought to manage her abortion independently and avoided medical intervention despite experiencing complications. ProPublica’s own admission that she took abortion pills unsupervised begs the question—how is this a failure of Georgia law? When one chooses to fly solo with potentially life-threatening health decisions, the accountability seems to rest elsewhere. The autopsy revealed a cocktail of painkillers, including the notorious opioid, fentanyl. One might say it’s the perfect recipe for disaster, yet Harris will shoehorn this into her “Trump Abortion Bans” narrative without a second thought.
While Harris plans to parade these cases as evidence of the horrors that stem from pro-life policies, the actual legal framework in Georgia explicitly allows for medical exceptions. Each abortion law in place across the nation comes equipped with provisions meant to safeguard women’s health, yet such critical points tend to get buried under the rhetoric of those pushing for an unrestricted status quo on abortion. The tragedy here is that Harris is willing to exploit these women’s deaths for political gain without fully acknowledging that their stories are not directly linked to the laws she vilifies.
Debate surrounding abortion legislation continues to be a hotbed of tension. While Harris plans to present her narrative with flair, conservative voices highlight that the actual link between these cases and abortion laws is tenuous, to say the least. The facts, clouded by emotional appeals, might excite her base, but when scrutinized, only serve to highlight the broken logic inherent in progressive arguments surrounding abortion. The irony appears lost on those pushing for unrestricted access while neglecting the consequences that might arise from bypassing vital medical oversight.
