Staff Reports
Hillary Clinton has once again taken to the airwaves, this time to deliver her latest critique of former President Donald Trump. Appearing on MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Clinton launched into an uninvited tirade alleging that Trump’s brand of politics, steeped in “hate and division,” poses a grave threat to the safety and security of the United States. One can only wonder if she has looked in the mirror lately; after all, her own track record is not exactly free from divisive rhetoric.
Clinton expressed her firm belief that Americans who appreciate unity and stability would presumably reject Trump come the next election. It’s a bold stance for someone who has spent nearly a decade whining about the 2016 election results while dodging questions about her own disastrous policies and embarrassments. Yet, in her mind, she’s the harbinger of hope, despite the fact that many who have tasted her “leadership” would rather chew on a rusty nail than go through that again.
Just a day after Trump was almost murdered by a deranged leftist lunatic for the second time in as many months, Hillary Clinton got on TV and described the former president as "dangerous," and ordered the media to "stick with" parroting that narrative. https://t.co/rMyQlCkhEU
— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) September 17, 2024
Her comments took a dramatic turn as she claimed Trump is a “demagogue” who has disqualified himself time and again, just like she disqualified herself from being a trusted leader when she decided to operate her private email server while secretary of state. Clinton’s penchant for dramatics is nothing new, but to call out someone else for “chaos” while neglecting her own party’s mishaps is rich, even for her.
As she continued her diatribe, Clinton indicated that people are fed up with the “chaos” associated with Trump’s presidency and want to move forward—not backward—implying that the current administration has been a model of stability and success. Perhaps she missed how the Biden administration has cemented its own brand of chaos with skyrocketing inflation, supply chain issues, and foreign policy blunders that leave even seasoned diplomats scratching their heads.
In a curious twist, she warned against a “romance with dictators” while conveniently overlooking the cozy relationships established during her time in office. The irony of accusing Trump of a lack of concern for “innocent lives” rings hollow, considering her own role in foreign policy decisions that led to dire consequences. Yet in Clinton’s world, the past is a mere backdrop to her continued crusade against Trump, who apparently warrants a lifetime of critique, while she remains the eternal victim of a supposed right-wing conspiracy.
