Staff Reports
House Republicans are preparing for their second candidate forum, but not without facing some setbacks and rejected rule changes. The rejected rules have made it easier for candidates to advance as the official nominee on the House floor, as they now only require a simple majority within the conference. The party will hold another candidate forum, allowing other lawmakers to declare their bids for speaker, at 1 p.m. on Friday.
House GOP rejects rule changes as party continues search for speaker
DETAILS: https://t.co/Cl2fNkYGEZ https://t.co/Cl2fNkYGEZ
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) October 13, 2023
In a closed-door meeting that lasted about one and a half hours, GOP lawmakers faced a major setback when Majority Leader Steve Scalise withdrew his name from consideration for speaker. Additionally, four amendments to change party rules regarding the nomination process were shot down. A proposed amendment by Rep. Bill Huizenga, which aimed to strip members of their committee assignments if they did not support the party’s nominated candidate, was also rejected. Some members considered this proposal “silly” and argued that whoever receives the nomination should have enough influence to secure the speakership.
It is unclear whether the rejected amendments are completely dismissed or if they could be revisited at a later time when all party members are present. Despite some members leaving Washington, D.C. for the weekend, they have been called to return. However, it remains uncertain if they will be back in time for the party’s afternoon meeting. The timing of the amendments meeting was changed from noon to 10 a.m. to allow absent members more time to return, but eventually, the decision was made to proceed without them.
During the candidate forum, Rep. Jim Jordan is expected to announce himself as a candidate for the speakership. Other lawmakers may also declare their intentions, as some members have expressed openness to other options. With these developments, the race for the next House speaker promises to be interesting and possibly contentious.
These rejected rule changes show that the Republican Party is focused on streamlining the process of electing a new leader. By allowing candidates to advance with a simple majority, they are eliminating unnecessary hurdles that could delay the selection of a new speaker. It’s refreshing to see the party prioritize efficiency and productivity. However, the rejected amendment to strip members of committee assignments if they don’t support the party’s nominated candidate is a missed opportunity. It would have ensured party unity and loyalty, preventing situations like the opposition to Scalise. Nevertheless, it’s crucial for the Republican Party to select a strong leader who can effectively guide them through the challenges ahead.
