Staff Reports
Hunter Biden, the son of President Biden, plans to plead “not guilty” to the federal felony counts related to his alleged lying about his drug use to purchase a firearm. In a letter to the judge, Hunter’s lawyers requested that he be allowed to enter his plea remotely via video conference, claiming that his Secret Service detail would be too disruptive to local residents. They argued that holding the proceeding in person would place a significant burden on government resources and logistics. However, it’s amusing to see how Hunter Biden expects special treatment, considering that former President Trump was required to appear in person for his not guilty pleas in multiple cases.
Hunter Biden’s lawyers insist that he’s not seeking any special treatment with this request, but it’s hard to believe. He has already received lenient treatment in the past when it comes to federal charges. It seems like he’s once again trying to dodge the consequences for his actions. His lawyers argue that Hunter understands the charges against him and his rights and that a video conference would be sufficient for his initial appearance. But shouldn’t everyone be treated equally under the law? It’s baffling how the federal justice system bends over backward for Hunter Biden while other defendants, including Trump and his allies, are not given the same special treatment.
New: Hunter Biden's lawyers are asking the court to allow him to enter his not guilty plea via video because, among other reasons, his Secret Service detail would be disruptive to locals.
That does not appear to have been sufficient to keep Trump from having to go in person. pic.twitter.com/Uv3ia1FF7M— Sarah Bedford (@sarahcbedford) September 19, 2023
While it remains to be seen if the judge will grant Hunter’s request, it’s clear that he is being given preferential treatment. He has been residing in California since his initial court appearance in Delaware, and his lawyers assert that he has complied with all conditions. Federal prosecutors are opposing the idea of a remote appearance, which is not surprising considering the scrutiny surrounding Hunter Biden’s case. It’s essential that our justice system treats everyone equally, regardless of their last name or political affiliations. Granting such requests to Hunter undermines the credibility of our legal system and perpetuates the notion of a two-tiered justice system.
