Staff Reports
Jack Smith, an unwavering critic of transparency, vehemently opposes the introduction of cameras into the courtroom during the "election subversion" case involving Donald Trump. Smith appears to believe that he can conduct a covert show trial of the opposition leader without incurring any consequences. However, what is Smith's reluctance regarding the implementation of courtroom cameras? Does he have something concealed?
The Justice Dept. formally opposed a request to make the historic trial of a former president the first time federal courts allow TV cameras to broadcast or record a criminal trial. https://t.co/G5yT30MCT5
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) November 5, 2023
Conversely, John Lauro, an attorney for Trump, has stated in the past that the presence of cameras would increase transparency. This is consistent with Trump's steadfast advocacy for transparency during his entire presidency. Ultimately, should Smith genuinely assert confidence in the soundness of his case, what concerns does he have regarding the public's access to the proceedings?
Permitting cameras in the courtroom, according to the media (NBCUniversal and others), would inspire confidence in the verdict of this politically explosive trial. Undoubtedly, this case, which involves the foremost Republican candidate for president in 2024, Trump, and the government of Joe Biden, is politically delicate and historically significant. In this situation, the media agencies are correct in their assertion that continuous public oversight of the justice system is vital.
Smith, on the other hand, refutes these arguments and asserts that the judge has a legal duty to prohibit the use of cameras in the courtroom. In addition to expressing apprehensions regarding potential intimidation and hostility directed at witnesses and jurors, he proposes that attendees "grandstand for the cameras." Smith's apparent forgetfulness regarding the fact that he orchestrated a sensational and extensively covered press conference to unveil the allegations against Trump is noteworthy.
Johnson has been characterized by Trump as "deranged" and he has accused Judge Tanya Chutkan of overseeing a witch chase. Trump is not one to hold back. Chutkan has likewise consented to a confidentiality order that restricts Trump's statements regarding the case. Smith's case appears to be proceeding concurrently with the televised "election subversion" case involving Trump in Georgia. Fani Willis (D), the prosecutor in the Georgia case, has faced significant criticism for her excessive request for Trump to take a mugshot. Smith might be concerned that permitting cameras in the courtroom could provide Trump with a strategic advantage to exploit an unfavorable circumstance.
In general, it appears that Jack Smith is making every effort to conceal information regarding Trump's case from the public for personal gain. In line with Trump's advocacy for transparency, the media justifiably contends that the installation of courtroom cameras would bolster public trust in the justice system. It raises the inquiry as to what Smith is apprehensive about.
