Another day, another scandal for Vice President Kamala Harris. This time, it isn’t just her dubious policy proposals that are drawing scrutiny, but allegations of plagiarism that could rival some of the most egregious offenses in political history. A thorough analysis from Aaron Sibarium at the Washington Free Beacon reveals that Harris has apparently borrowed more than just a few ideas; she has reportedly lifted significant portions of her work from others, including testimony from a Republican colleague and even a fictional account about human trafficking.
The backbone of this latest plagiarism scandal is Harris’s testimony related to the John R. Justice Act, where around 80 percent of her statements were found to be nearly identical to those given by another district attorney two months earlier. Sibarium uncovered that Harris inadvertently duplicated typos and grammatical errors, turning her supposed original work into a bizarre “copy-paste” fiasco. It turns out that amid her aspirations to champion justice, she was busy playing literary hide-and-seek with other people’s speeches.
Report: Kamala Harris Busted for Plagiarism in Testimony to Congress https://t.co/wg3zWNjrEQ #TrumpGirlOnFire
— ✞🌸TrumpGirlOnFire 🔥 (@TrumpGirlOnFire) October 22, 2024
If that weren’t enough, Sibarium’s investigation revealed that Harris might have also pirated material from a nonprofit organization handling human trafficking issues. The tale came from the Polaris Project, which went so far as to alter critical details for confidentiality. Yet, it seems the Vice President had no qualms about appropriating the essence of the story without so much as a nod to its origins. Is it fair to say that Harris is not just “smart on crime,” but also possibly smart on the art of misappropriation?
Adding a splash of irony, a plagiarism consultant for The New York Times has since declared that Harris’s plagiarism case is “far more serious” than previously acknowledged. This evaluation indicates just how deep the rabbit hole really goes, with an extensive 40-page document detailing a staggering 29 counts of alleged plagiarism. From her book to her past speeches, it appears Kamala has been quite the busy bee, pilfering phrases and paragraphs left and right.
In a political arena where authenticity has become an increasingly rare commodity, these revelations pose a significant challenge for Harris and her team. Instead of engaging in substantive conversations about crime, justice, or human trafficking, they must now grapple with the specter of dishonesty that looms large. Given her history of dubious claims and flimsy credibility, it seems that Harris could soon be facing even more serious questions than simply how to address the nation’s issues. Instead, examiners might demand to know whether she can ever come up with an original thought again.