Staff Reports
Kamala Harris recently attempted to bask in the glory of her supposed foresight regarding the Trump administration, declaring that she saw this moment coming. During her speech at the Leading Women Defined Summit in Dana Point, California, she claimed her campaign had warned Americans about the implications of Donald Trump returning to the White House. Apparently, the former Vice President believes the current landscape instills “a great sense of fear,” as if fear was not the direct result of her own party’s actions during its time in charge.
Scott Jennings, CNN’s conservative analyst, wasted no time in shredding Harris’s self-congratulatory remarks. While the audience at the summit cheered, Jennings was quick to highlight that full-throated support for the Trump administration continues to run deep among his voter base. This unwavering support, Jennings noted, is tied to tangible outcomes, including a general sense of optimism about the economy, despite any hurdles posed by current tariffs. Unlike the dire predictions espoused by the likes of Harris, many Americans have realized that sometimes tough measures lead to even tougher decisions.
Even conservatives might have mixed feelings about Trump’s tariffs, yet Jennings pointed out that such economic maneuvers were transparently on Trump’s agenda from the start. The perception that the American economy feels the strain from such policies does not deter Trump loyalists. In many ways, it underscores a fundamental truth: these voters are keenly aware of the grander picture, choosing to support policies that promise to shift America back towards economic success and away from the left’s cultural chaos.
Scott Jennings Nukes Kamala’s ‘I Told You So’ Comment, Explains Why Trump Voters Are Still Happy With Him https://t.co/jMCn7GwcXx
— Observing Time (@TimeObserving) April 4, 2025
Harris’s assertion that as a Vice President she was somehow prescient only serves to heighten the case for Trump’s pragmatic approach. Jennings turned the tables with a classic rhetorical flourish, alluding to the very choices that led voters to Trump’s door. The public’s desire for secure borders and a firm stance against the absurdities of leftist ideology reinforces Jennings’s counter-argument to Harris’s futile claim. Many Trump supporters, instead, could just as easily say they predicted a turn towards conservative values and the restoration of order on immigration.
The so-called buyer’s remorse rhetoric surrounding Trump has become a favorite narrative among those who oppose him, but Jennings shredded this notion. According to polls, Trump’s approval remained robust, even climbing two points after announcing his tariffs. The notion that disillusioned Trump voters are abandoning ship is little more than a comforting fantasy for Democrats. Actual evidence suggests that far from feeling remorse, Trump’s supporters find themselves largely happy with his performance—understanding the complex intricacies of policy that often elude the left.
The economic landscape is convoluted, one that Harris and her followers seem ill-equipped to fathom. With Trump at the helm, the moving parts of American economics highlight that the path to greatness often involves making tough choices. Many Americans recognize that hurtle across the finish line of recovering American greatness would never be a simple sprint; instead, it’s a marathon fraught with decisions that require discernment and unwavering resolve. Harris’s claims of foreboding are little more than noise to a resilient core of voters who see the light at the end of the tunnel, and they understand what needs to be done to get there.
