Staff Reports
Kamala Harris recently sat down for an interview with the National Association of Black Journalists. This event was characterized by an unmistakable difference in treatment compared to when former President Trump was in the hot seat. While Trump faced tough questions and critical scrutiny, Harris was handed a box of softballs. This disparity raises eyebrows, especially among those accustomed to the harsher realities of political discourse.
Despite this cushy setup, Harris struggled to deliver coherent responses to straightforward queries. For instance, when asked if Americans are better off now under the Biden-Harris administration compared to four years ago, she danced around the question like a seasoned politician. It’s clear that the reality of the situation—namely, that most Americans are indeed worse off—was not something she could acknowledge. Instead, she opted to present herself as a fresh face in politics, pushing the narrative that she represents the “new way forward,” though most listeners could see through the charade.
This was the exact moment the legacy media realized Kamala Harris is a big problem
Watch their expressions and see if you can tell when they are putting it together.
Everything about Scamala Harris is fake and cringe. Is that weird?
pic.twitter.com/CW2GidA4FN— Cash Loren (@CashLorenShow) September 19, 2024
As is customary for Biden and Harris, she relied heavily on recycled talking points. She touted claims of creating a mythical 16 million new jobs, a number that has become as dubious as it is grandiose. One might wonder why the administration insists on these fabrications when the economic struggles faced by everyday Americans tell a different story altogether. This interview, laden with pre-packaged rhetoric, revealed her inability to engage in genuine dialogue, unlike Trump who manages to infuse humor and authenticity into his appearances.
The interview was tagged as a “campaign event” by the Harris team, regardless of the NABJ’s assurances that it wouldn’t serve as a campaign rally. This disregard for the NABJ’s statement speaks volumes about the level of respect the Harris camp affords to the organization. It’s clear they expect the press to act merely as a platform for their orchestrated messaging rather than as a challenging body holding them accountable.
The ending moments of the interview provided a striking visual: Harris made a quick exit, hardly bothering to acknowledge the audience, offering only a dismissive wave. The expressions on the faces of the interviewers betrayed their disbelief. It was as if they were collectively pondering what they had just witnessed. Rather than a moment of shared joy and engagement, it was a display of detached indifference. This episode adds another layer to the already complicated persona of Kamala Harris, hinting that beneath the polished veneer lies a deeper disconnection from the very constituents she is supposed to represent.
