Staff Reports
Senator John Neely Kennedy, the pride of Louisiana, once again showcased his unyielding commitment to hold President Joe Biden’s judicial nominees to a high standard. As reported by The Daily Caller, Kennedy didn’t hold back during a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, where he grilled judicial nominee Sara E. Hill.
Armed with his impressive academic background, including degrees from prestigious institutions like Vanderbilt and the University of Virginia, Kennedy wasted no time putting Hill to the test. He asked her to explain the difference between a “stay order” and an “injunction.” However, to Kennedy’s dismay, Hill fumbled over her words and struggled to provide a coherent answer.
?President Biden’s district judge nominee Sara Hill was unable to explain to @SenJohnKennedy the difference between a “stay order” and an “injunction.”
How can an individual who wants to be a federal judge possibly not know this?
Senator Durbin even congratulated Hill… pic.twitter.com/6oJAKqhN3I
— Carrie Severino (@JCNSeverino) November 15, 2023
Carrie Severino, President of JCN, didn’t hesitate to share the video of Hill’s perplexing response, rightfully questioning how a nominee for a federal judge position could be unfamiliar with such fundamental legal concepts. Additionally, Senator Dick Durban’s lighthearted comment about Hill “passing the Kennedy bar exam” only added insult to injury, making it clear that Hill’s performance fell short of expectations.
The contrast between Kennedy’s rigorous questioning and Hill’s inability to provide a clear explanation highlighted the stark differences in their qualifications and preparedness for the role. Kennedy’s relentless vetting of Biden’s nominees has become a hallmark of his approach, as he continues to shed light on their lack of essential knowledge and expertise.
In the case of Hill, a nominee for the Federal District Judge position in Northern Oklahoma, her credentials and background as a former Cherokee Nation Attorney General and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney were overshadowed by her inability to meet Kennedy’s expectations. Despite her legal background, the exchange with Kennedy exposed a concerning gap in her understanding of fundamental legal concepts, raising valid concerns about her suitability for the position.
Kennedy’s unwavering dedication to holding nominees to account serves as a testament to his commitment to upholding the integrity of the judicial system. With his sharp intellect and thorough scrutiny, Kennedy continues to be a formidable force in challenging the qualifications of President Biden’s nominees and ensuring that only the most capable individuals are entrusted with judicial appointments.
