in

Leaked Memo Reveals DC Judge’s Shocking Bias Against President Trump

The so-called “impartial” judiciary in Washington, D.C. has once again exposed its true colors: anti-Trump, anti-American, and blatantly biased. A recently leaked memo reveals that federal judge James Boasberg and his cronies openly fretted to Chief Justice Roberts about the mere possibility that the Trump Administration might ignore court orders. Keep in mind—this wasn’t idle chatter about some far-flung legal principle. No, it was about the sitting president, who conveniently also happens to be embroiled in countless lawsuits right there in Boasberg’s own courtroom. Talk about conflict of interest masquerading as concern!

What makes this memo so damning is that the Trump Administration has complied with every single court order. Yet, Boasberg and his crew carried on like spoiled children, worried that their precious rulings wouldn’t be respected. This isn’t justice—it’s a vendetta. The usual presumption that public officials act in good faith was thrown out the window the moment President Trump became the defendant. The D.C. federal bench, apparently infused with deep left-wing venom, feels free to treat him as public enemy number one. This blatant bias should alarm anyone who believes in the rule of law, not biased activism disguised as justice.

Boasberg’s hostility wasn’t just whispered behind closed doors. Shortly after the conference, he halted Trump’s efforts to deport illegal immigrants to El Salvador. Months later, Boasberg demanded the Trump Administration give those same individuals a chance to legally challenge their deportation. In other words, this judge isn’t just sitting on the bench—he’s actively undermining America’s immigration laws and Trump’s lawful authority. It’s yet another weapon in the liberal arsenal to sabotage policies that millions of Americans supported at the ballot box. 

 

Thankfully, the Supreme Court saw the writing on the wall. They stepped in to curb these rogue judges’ ability to impose nationwide injunctions that grind the president’s agenda to a halt. This victory was more than legal—it was a necessary blow against judicial activism run amok. The radical left’s attempt to thwart the will of the people through the courts is nothing short of a threat to democracy itself. Judges like Boasberg think they’re above the law, but the Supreme Court just reminded them who really holds the power.

The deeper truth here is clear: Washington’s judiciary isn’t a neutral arbiter of justice. It’s a weaponized tool of the radical left used to sabotage America First policies every chance it gets. When judges stop respecting the office of the president, especially one elected with a historic mandate, that’s not law—it’s a coup by unelected bureaucrats. How long will patriotic Americans tolerate this reckless abuse of power before demanding accountability? The courts were meant to protect the Constitution, not wage war on those who want to defend it. The time to expose and defeat this judicial leftism is now.

Written by Staff Reports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Democrat Senator’s Dark Secret: Crowbar, Scandal, and the Liberal Hypocrisy Unraveled