Staff Reports
Axios reporter Sara Fischer made waves on CNN recently by expressing her frustration over the audacity of former President Donald Trump having a platform to speak freely on X, the site formerly known as Twitter. It seems that Trump’s lively return to X, after being unceremoniously booted almost four years ago, has sent shivers down the spines of the legacy media complex. The idea that Trump might share his thoughts without the usual filter has unnerved those in the political elite and the mainstream media, proving yet again how much they fear a free and open exchange of ideas.
This CNN segment showcased the palpable anxiety permeating the media and government. One Washington Post reporter even bizarrely inquired whether anything could be done to prevent Trump’s remarks from disseminating through X, citing concerns over “misinformation.” As the Left rallies against perceived threats to their narrative, they exhibit an impressive ability to panic at the slightest hint of dissent. It’s particularly laughable to see someone like Thierry Breton, a European Union commissioner, threatening consequences for Elon Musk over claims of misinformation. It seems that some in Europe are bent on reinforcing their own gates while trying to dictate terms to someone who has made it clear he prioritizes free speech.
CNN on President Trump’s interview with Elon Musk:
“These are people who aren't going to tune into traditional news — who aren't going to follow politics in a traditional sense — but they are going to tune into Elon Musk doing an X space with Trump. This is a group of people who… pic.twitter.com/2PFmuUwFt1
— Proud Elephant 🇺🇸🦅 (@ProudElephantUS) August 12, 2024
Fischer’s comments on CNN clearly indicated a disdain not only for Trump but also for the voters who resonate with him. Mocking what she called the “online fringe,” she completely underestimated a significant and potentially influential group of young, male voters who are not swayed by traditional media channels. Rather than recognizing the potential of this demographic, Fischer finds comfort in dismissing it, missing the irony that these very voters may well be the ones helping to reshape the political landscape.
As Trump and his potential running mate JD Vance engage with influential personalities on social media, they tap into an energized and often overlooked movement. The numbers don’t lie; over 30 million viewers have already tuned into Trump’s conversation with Musk. For many undecided voters or those disillusioned by mainstream media’s noise, the direct dialogue offers an inviting refuge. Instead of the usual talking points that are typically vomited out during structured debates, Trump’s X conversation provides a refreshing opportunity to discuss policy and reflect on his experiences.
Not everyone seems to grasp the significance of this interaction. Figures like Alyssa Farah Griffin appear bewildered by Trump’s strategy, suggesting it will do little to sway undecided voters. Such binary thinking reflects a profound misunderstanding of the current political climate. Those who tend to shun traditional debates often yearn for a more genuine conversation—something that Trump’s X interview successfully delivers. With his ability to discuss personal experiences and articulate his vision directly, Trump skillfully navigates a platform that the mainstream media can’t control or distort.
The legacy media, so engrossed in presenting a sanitized version of the political landscape, continues to overlook the subtleties of Trump’s appeal. By circumventing the typical propaganda channels via X, Trump connects directly with audiences that many insiders fail to recognize. This ability to pierce the bubble of conventional media narratives shows that the former president knows how to communicate effectively and reach those whose votes are still up for grabs.
