In today’s climate of media hysteria, the left’s desperate attempts to smear conservatives have once again come crashing down. The latest target: a Fox News interview with Donald Trump from last year. Liberals jumped on this, claiming Fox edited Trump’s response about Jeffrey Epstein. Yet, when we peel back the drama, we find another manufactured scandal.
At the center of their alleged outrage is the curious case of a broadcast edited for time, which somehow evolved into a deep-seated conspiracy on par with the infamous Kamala Harris and “60 Minutes” debacle. The latter involved genuine concealment and corporate stonewalling, yet the left insists on drawing flimsy parallels. This smells more like an act of desperation than diligent journalism.
In fact, Trump’s full interview has been publicly available since last year. Where’s the subterfuge? It was there for all to see—to listen to, unedited. Liberals want us to believe there’s a hidden agenda, but the evidence doesn’t support their cries. The question is why this so-called scandal didn’t make waves until now. Is it because the facts don’t fit their narrative? It appears so.
Thursday Delivered Another Non-Scandal – a Look Into the Fox News Trump Interview Editing Accusationshttps://t.co/zE6MFKmyb4
— RedState (@RedState) July 18, 2025
What really needs scrutiny is the left’s selective outrage and the gaping lack of consistency in their arguments. As the liberal media spins its webs of deceit, the conservative voice stands resolute and unyielding. If anything was altered, it was merely Trump’s answer acknowledging the obvious: discretion is sometimes necessary. But, in the end, he was clear in his response, making no significant change.
Their unfounded accusations raise an essential question: why manufacture outrage where none exists? Is the aim to distract from real issues facing the nation? While they clutch at straws, the conservative voice remains ever steadfast. The truth is on our side, and try as they might, the left won’t win this media war.