Staff Reports
The aftermath of the recent presidential debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump unleashed a torrent of frustration among conservative commentators, particularly with the moderators from ABC who were seen as cheerleading Harris throughout the event. Despite the media declaring Harris the victor, it seems her camp is angling for a second debate, potentially a sign that confidence isn’t exactly brimming.
The debate structure appeared to favor Harris at every turn, raising eyebrows among voters who care about substantial issues like the economy. Instead of addressing these pressing concerns, the moderators focused heavily on Trump, pushing him into the hot seat while allowing Harris to launch into lengthy tirades. The glaring imbalance left many on the right questioning whether the goal was a fair exchange of ideas or a scripted performance designed to elevate the vice president’s image.
BREAKING: Megyn Kelly just went on an intense rant calling out the disgusting ABC hosts for working with Kamala Harris to sink Trump and STEAL THE ELECTION
"I'm ashamed of those moderators at ABC News. They did exactly what their bosses wanted them to do. The person who runs ABC… pic.twitter.com/Xsq2Mm9Huo
— George (@BehizyTweets) September 11, 2024
Megyn Kelly delivered a blistering critique of the ABC moderators on social media, blasting their choice of questions and the overall format. She pointed out the absurdity of focusing nearly all inquiries around Trump controversies instead of the pressing issues that matter to Americans. This questioning pattern seemed less about journalism and more about setting a trap for the former president, giving Harris ample opportunity to hurl unfounded accusations while escaping with minimal scrutiny.
The biased nature of the debate was especially evident in the so-called fact-checking process. Kelly highlighted how ABC was quick to pounce on any remarks made by Trump while turning a blind eye to the falsehoods coming from Harris. This double standard infuriated many who expect a modicum of fairness in political discourse, and it seemed crystal clear that the moderators were more interested in running interference for Harris than adhering to journalistic integrity.
In her post-debate analysis, Kelly didn’t hold back, rebuking Republicans for even agreeing to participate in a debate moderated by such a biased outlet. Trump, demonstrating a willingness to engage with the public on his terms, showcased courage that Harris could only dream of. The left continues to prioritize winning over honesty, showing that their commitment to truth takes a backseat when their narratives are at stake. Ultimately, what transpired at the debate serves as a stark reminder that expecting fair treatment from the mainstream media is a lost cause, particularly when it comes to protecting candidates like Kamala Harris.
