Staff Reports
Megyn Kelly has once again proven herself to be a fierce advocate for fairness in the media, launching an all-out assault on the ABC News moderators during the recent Trump vs. Harris debate. The former Fox News host didn’t hold back her disdain, expressing her disgust over what she perceived as a blatant attempt to gang up on Donald Trump. It’s hard to argue against her point—who wouldn’t be outraged by a one-sided debate format that felt more like an assault than a discussion?
Kelly’s post-debate critique painted a damning picture of moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis. According to her, their orchestration of the event seemed less about presenting a fair debate and more about carrying out a hit job on Trump. With a close friend of Kamala Harris in the driver’s seat, it’s no surprise the moderators seemed to take their cues from a script prepared by the Harris campaign. One could almost feel the undercurrents of collusion in the air, making the debate feel less like a contest of ideas and more like a planned ambush.
🔥𝗠𝗲𝗴𝘆𝗻 𝗞𝗲𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗦𝗹𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝗔𝗕𝗖 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀: 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗦𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽, 𝗙𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗛𝗶𝗺 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁-𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸𝘀 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗞𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝗚𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗮 𝗣𝗮𝘀𝘀 pic.twitter.com/3EXYdZxnkV
— Steven Miller, MD, PhD (@SageListener) September 11, 2024
The podcaster fired off a series of barbs aimed at how the moderators relentlessly fact-checked Trump while giving Harris a free pass. In Kelly’s words, it was a “three-against-one” showdown, with Trump valiantly trying to fend off the relentless attacks while his opponent skated by with unfettered deception. This set-up forced the former president into the role of the lone knight defending the realm from a trio of dragon-like critics. It’s a rather unflattering portrayal of supposed “neutrality” in the media—it turns out that neutrality is just a concept that doesn’t apply when the stakes are high.
Kelly had a realization that should have been obvious to everyone: trusting ABC News with the debate was akin to letting the fox guard the henhouse. The disparity in how the moderators approached the two candidates could not have been more glaring. As Kelly pointed out, every misstep from Trump was scrutinized, while Harris enjoyed the luxury of being handed a get-out-of-jail-free card. It’s a tactic that’s as transparent as it is irritating, leaving viewers wondering if they were watching a debate or a scripted reality show.
Moreover, Kelly wasn’t shy about expressing her anger at the system as a whole—the legacy media, the moderators, and the way they collectively undermined the democratic process in their quest to influence the election. She believes they’re not just biased but actively attempting to sway public opinion against Trump, creating an environment that’s more akin to a smear campaign than legitimate journalism. Predictably, the left-wing media machine is doing what it does best, and Kelly suspects this will backfire spectacularly when the American people catch wind of the ruse.
In a climate where inflation, crime, and border issues are at the forefront of American concerns, one thing becomes crystal clear: Trump remains the best option to address these critical matters. While the media may cling to their politically motivated narratives, the people are smarter than they think, and as Kelly suggests, the burgeoning empathy for Trump may just catch the left off-guard. After all, no one likes being duped, especially by those who claim to seek the truth while hiding behind their carefully crafted agendas.
