Staff Reports
Elon Musk’s recent foray into Wisconsin politics has sent shockwaves through the state’s contentious Supreme Court election, drawing national attention to what has become the most expensive judicial race in U.S. history. At a rally in Green Bay, Musk handed out two $1 million checks to voters who signed a petition opposing “activist judges,” a move that critics labeled as vote-buying but Musk defended as a stand for judicial reform. With the stakes high, Musk’s financial backing of conservative candidate Brad Schimel, totaling over $20 million, was part of a broader effort to shift the ideological balance of Wisconsin’s Supreme Court, which has been pivotal in rulings on abortion, redistricting, and election laws.
The rally, attended by thousands, was more than just a political event—it was a spectacle designed to energize conservative voters and challenge the liberal status quo. Musk’s rhetoric about saving civilization resonated with many attendees, but it also sparked protests outside the venue. Liberal groups accused Musk of attempting to “buy” the election and highlighted his vested interests, such as Tesla’s legal battles in Wisconsin over dealership laws. Meanwhile, Schimel distanced himself from Musk’s flashy tactics, emphasizing his commitment to impartiality and denying any coordination with the billionaire’s efforts.
Despite Musk’s financial muscle and high-profile campaigning, the election resulted in a decisive victory for liberal judge Susan Crawford. Her win preserved the court’s 4-3 liberal majority and dealt a significant blow to both Musk and former President Donald Trump, who had endorsed Schimel. Crawford’s campaign capitalized on Musk’s involvement, framing it as an assault on democracy and judicial independence. Her victory speech underscored this narrative, declaring that Wisconsin voters had rejected attempts to undermine their courts with unprecedented spending.
This outcome is a sobering reminder of the challenges they face in battleground states like Wisconsin. While Musk’s unconventional approach brought attention to issues like judicial activism and election integrity, it also galvanized liberal opposition and raised questions about the effectiveness of such high-profile interventions. The defeat highlights the importance of grassroots organizing and messaging that resonates with everyday voters rather than relying solely on financial clout.
Looking ahead, the implications of this election extend far beyond Wisconsin. The state’s Supreme Court is expected to rule on critical issues that could shape national politics heading into the 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential race. For conservatives, the loss serves as both a setback and a call to refine their strategy in future judicial contests. As for Musk, his polarizing entry into political activism underscores the growing influence—and controversy—of billionaires in shaping America’s electoral landscape.
