Staff Reports
In a stunning display of the New York Times’ blatant bias, the newspaper has once again proven that they will hire anyone as long as it satisfies their twisted agendas. It’s no secret that the newsroom at the Times harbors an overwhelming hatred towards Israel, which was one of the driving forces behind the departure of editorial writer Bari Weiss. It’s truly mind-boggling how the Left, especially those indoctrinated in elite colleges, has fallen for the false narrative of Israel being an apartheid state or a colonizer. Such historical illiteracy is truly alarming.
Wait, The NYT Hired a Hitler-Loving Reporter to Cover the Israel-Hamas War?
https://t.co/dxlIVEMaEM— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) October 23, 2023
One prime example of the Times’ biased reporting is when they ran with Hamas propaganda during the Gaza hospital incident. Instead of presenting the facts, they shamelessly blamed Israel for intentionally striking the location. However, the truth later emerged that it was actually a rocket misfire from Islamic Jihad that caused the tragedy. It’s sickening to think that the media, through their irresponsible reporting, essentially did the terrorists’ work for them, igniting a wave of anger and protests across the Muslim world. But then again, should we really be surprised that the Times would hire a pro-Hitler reporter to cover the Israel-Hamas war?
Yes, you read that correctly. The New York Times has actually hired a pro-Nazi videographer to cover the conflict. How on earth did this happen? The paper claims to have addressed the issue with the journalist and ensured that he understood their standards before bringing him on as a freelancer. Well, if that’s their idea of a thorough vetting process, then it’s safe to say that their standards are shockingly low.
The rehired freelance videographer in question, Soliman Hijjy, has a well-documented history of praising Adolf Hitler on social media. In a 2012 Facebook post, he brazenly declared, “How great you are, Hitler,” in Arabic. And if that wasn’t disturbing enough, in a 2018 post, Hijjy referred to himself as being “in tune like Hitler during the Holocaust” or “in a state of harmony as Hitler was during the Holocaust.” Yet, despite these glaring red flags, the New York Times is standing by Hijjy, claiming that he has maintained high journalistic standards and delivered impartial work.
Impartial? Are they serious? This man openly admires Hitler and is now covering the Israel-Hamas war. It’s clear where his sympathies lie, and it’s certainly not with Israel. The fact that the Times is defending his rehiring is not only baffling, but it also speaks volumes about the newspaper’s lack of integrity and complete disregard for factual and unbiased reporting.
We must remain vigilant in exposing the biased agenda of news outlets like the New York Times. It is disheartening to see such a prominent publication prioritize their own narratives over objective journalism. We can only hope that more Americans will see through their propaganda and seek out alternative sources of news that prioritize truth and fairness.
