Staff Reports
Jim Acosta and Don Lemon—two former CNN darlings—decided to sit down and chat with each other on a podcast. The idea that two of CNN’s castoffs, known for their less-than-impressive journalistic integrity, believe they can resuscitate the media’s credibility is laughable. They discuss ways to restore trust, despite spending years spewing biased narratives with a no-holds-barred disdain for anything conservative.
This fiasco is typical for the liberal media. They fancy themselves arbiters of truth while dismissing real Americans who question their obvious agendas. Instead of confronting their past failures, they hide behind a façade of change that nobody actually buys. Who are they fooling with their living room podcasts? Only folks desperate for stale, left-wing propaganda.
Lemon boasts about not promoting false equivalency on his show. That’s his misguided claim to fame—along with teaming up with Acosta to supposedly reshape media trust. The notion alone borders on delusion. The world learned long ago to question the integrity of talking heads who masquerade as impartial journalists while pushing blatantly skewed rhetoric.
Two Former CNN Hosts Interviewed Each Other on a Podcast. What They Discussed Was Hilarious.
You have got to be kidding me. Nothing says I like to smell my own farts than two former CNN hosts debating whether or not they’re losers essentially.https://t.co/4MpLPEQRWN
— TraderMike (@mikel_trader) April 24, 2025
Meanwhile, the media, alongside its liberal allies, continues its crusade against conservatism. They choose to ignore dire issues like illegal immigration’s impact on national security. Their narrative covers sob stories, omitting the crimes committed by those deported. They spare no attention for the victims of these crimes, instead painting law enforcement as the villains.
Lemon and Acosta, poster children for media hypocrisy, claim to stand for honesty. Yet, the very idea of trusting these ex-CNN figures is absurd. The American public is weary of being force-fed narratives shaped by elitist agendas. Isn’t it time we ask, who really benefits from this charade?
