Staff Reports
Trump’s choice for Energy Secretary, Chris Wright, the CEO of Liberty Energy, is making waves by advocating for the importance of fossil fuels in human development. In a world where many seem to have adopted a “fossil fuels are evil” mantra, Wright brings a refreshing perspective that acknowledges the critical role that reliable, affordable energy plays in daily life. Declaring that energy is the lifeblood of society, he posits that proper access to energy resources is fundamental for achieving essential human successes like food, shelter, health, education, and longevity.
If Wright’s nomination gets the green light from the Senate, he will make history as the first Energy Secretary with real-world experience in the energy sector. This breaks a trend where energy policy decisions have often come from bureaucratic figures with little understanding of the industry. Wright expressed gratitude for this opportunity and emphasized his commitment to making energy solutions that truly benefit Americans. His energy-first philosophy contrasts starkly with many his predecessors who seemed more inclined to appease environmental activists than to promote sound, energy-based economic policies.
Trump’s pick for Energy Secretary argues that fossil fuels are integral to human development https://t.co/T3aUAAFkQi
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) November 19, 2024
Wright’s company, Liberty Energy, isn’t shy about its fossil fuel production and openly presents an ESG report titled “Bettering Human Lives,” which argues for the positive contributions of fossil fuels to global well-being. Unlike many in the sector, Wright and his team stand proudly behind their mission of supporting human flourishing through energy. They suggest that without such energy, the drivers of happiness and success—as simple as having a warm home or reliable food sources—would crumble.
It’s worth noting that Wright has a passionate interest in alternative energies, but he acknowledges their limitations. His remarks regarding solar, wind, and battery technologies highlight a pragmatic acceptance: these do not currently meet the needs that fossil fuels do. His advocacy for switching poor populations to cleaner cooking solutions such as propane illustrates a genuine concern for health and welfare, pushing back against the misguided narrative that all fossil fuels are bad in every context.
There’s palpable excitement about the change Wright could bring at the Department of Energy. Energy analysts express optimism that his presence could counteract the burdensome regulations that have stifled domestic energy production under the previous administration. With power to approve or deny LNG export permits—a key issue for many conservative energy advocates—Wright could potentially reverse draconian policies that have hampered U.S. competitiveness in global markets. His nomination, however, is expected to ignite opposition from the usual activist suspects, but encouragingly, public sentiment seems to be wavering in the face of far-left climate rhetoric.
In a climate where even Democratic strongholds are signaling a shift away from stringent fossil fuel regulations and bans on gas stoves, the Senate may find it advantageous to back Wright. Voters, after all, are increasingly rejecting the narrative that views fossil fuels as environmental foes. If Wright can push back against this anti-fossil fuel frenzy, he could usher in a new era of pragmatic energy policy in America—a scenario that sounds too good to be true for those who prioritize prosperity and progress through practical energy solutions.
