In an unexpected twist, a cohort of university professors has decided to jump aboard the Trump train, albeit not with the enthusiasm of hardcore MAGA fans. This group, dubbed “Lesser Evil,” has taken it upon themselves to circulate a petition among their academic peers, championing the Republican ticket ahead of the upcoming presidential election. Spearheaded by Daniel Klein, a professor at George Mason University, and Daniel Mahoney, a political science professor emeritus at Assumption University, the project underscores a simple yet profound realization: fundamental freedoms are much safer under a Republican regime than the current Democratic rule.
The initiative aims to garner support from tenured professors across American universities, and as of late last week, the movement has managed to recruit a total of 51 signatories. That number has doubled since August, indicating that perhaps the fog of liberal bias on college campuses is beginning to lift, at least for some. Notably, the group provides a visual representation of how Republicans fare “less poorly” than Democrats on several crucial issues—always a crowd-pleaser for those who like to quantify political folly.
Welcome Aboard: College Profs Backing Trump https://t.co/cuTGaOM8GY
— harry naasz (@mobridge41) September 6, 2024
While the trend isn’t exactly a mass migration from left-leaning ideologies to conservative principles, there’s clearly a spark of momentum. The irony is palpable: individuals like these professors and former Democrats like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. grasp the fundamental flaws in the Democratic machine, a concept seemingly lost on both far-left zealots and Never-Trump conservatives. For many of these newfound supporters, the issue isn’t merely Trump’s personality—though they recognize his celebrity status and his notable decisions while in office. Instead, the focus is on the broader issues that the left continues to mismanage or outright ignore.
Those issues, which could fill volumes, include the alarming decline of free speech, the government’s relentless expansion at the expense of taxpayers, and a ruling class that cherry-picks information like it’s a buffet. Citizens have witnessed skyrocketing taxes while essential goods become scarce, and the government increasingly prioritizes the comfort of illegal aliens over the needs of American citizens. Meanwhile, universities continue to churn out students who’s equipped with nothing more than rage and woke rhetoric, ill-prepared to handle the complexities of the real world.
Some dissenters, like Brooklyn College Professor Mitchell Langbert, believe that while Trump may not be the ideal candidate—citing past decisions such as his handling of COVID policies or his approach to personnel choices—Republicans are still the lesser of two evils. Langbert argues that the Democratic party, especially under any leadership resembling Kamala Harris’s administration, would usher in disaster. These professors, despite not being enamored with Trump himself, understand the stakes; they recognize that ignoring the current trajectory is akin to inviting Big Brother into their homes.
In summary, while the team bolstering Trump’s campaign may not be an army of diehard fans, it does represent a significant shift in the landscape of academia. It stands as a stark reminder that more Americans—regardless of their past affiliations—are beginning to wake up to reality. The big question remains: will this newfound awareness be enough to counteract the well-oiled Democratic machine come November? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the road ahead won’t be a walk in the park, especially when pitted against an establishment that thrives on ignorance and division.