Staff Reports
The circus surrounding Donald Trump is never short on drama, but the latest revelations about the Secret Service might just take the cake. A whistleblower has pointed the finger at high-ranking officials in Washington, who allegedly instructed agents not to even think about requesting additional security for Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. The outdoor event became the site of an assassination attempt, yet the bureaucratic red tape seems more concerning than the safety of a former president.
Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri wasted no time addressing this glaring inconsistency. He sent a letter to the acting head of the Secret Service, Ronald Rowe, demanding an explanation for the apparent contradiction between what Rowe told the Senate Judiciary Committee and the whistleblower’s claims. Rowe appeared to flaunt the idea that no security resources were denied, but the evidence is mounting like snow in February. It’s hard not to wonder if the agency is attempting to sweep this whole embarrassment under the rug like a dirty secret.
The whistleblower’s revelations suggest that agents at the Butler rally were flat-out told to skip the formal request for extra security. This basically amounts to saying, “Don’t ask, don’t get,” which is a massive oversight, especially when the protectee is Donald Trump, a man who seems to attract more attempts on his life than most. If they didn’t want to request the counter-sniper teams and CSD personnel, then they might as well have sent a carrier pigeon with a big red “target” sticker on it instead.
Remarkably, it was only a day before the event that any additional resources were even approved, leaving the counter-surveillance teams without sufficient time to scope out the area. Imagine needing a crucial tool to fix a leak in your house but getting it after the rain has already flooded your basement. Experts indicate that had the necessary security measures been in place, the situation could have been diffused before any harm came to the former president. But alas, the Secret Service continues to whirl around the idea of transparency while they keep dropping the ball.
In a stunning tragicomic twist, one of the reasons supposedly cited for the lack of resources was that Trump is a former president, as if he somehow becomes less of a target by relinquishing the Oval Office. The Secret Service continues to provide cover (pun entirely intended) for its questionable decision-making, claiming that all requests for resources had been fulfilled. This only prompts the question: If everything was approved, why does it feel like they’re being less than truthful?
Secret Service Told Not to Request Additional Security For Trump's Butler Rally: Whistleblowerhttps://t.co/orCVeDDDGz
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) August 25, 2024
What will it take for the Secret Service to step out of the shadows and admit they dropped the ball when it mattered most? The reality remains that if this was about anyone else—say, a member of the leftist elite—there would be a full investigation with cameras flashing, and a whole special committee grilling every witness in sight. The inconsistencies revealed here suggest something far more miraculous might be happening: the government’s ability to shrink from accountability in the face of a major security breach. If there’s one lesson to take from this surreal episode, it’s that when it comes to Donald Trump, safety might be the last consideration in a circus of political games.
