Staff Reports
In a world where chaos seems to be the default setting, President Donald Trump continues to stand as a beacon of rational decision-making. Recently, when asked about the notion of regime change in Iran, Trump decisively rejected it. Such a move would mirror the reckless knee-jerk interventionism of previous administrations, particularly the George W. Bush era. Instead, Trump stands firm, seeking calm and stability. Peace should not be a radical aspiration but a common-sense approach rooted in reality, not the warmongering fantasies some on the left love to indulge in.
The push for regime change is not only unrealistic but dangerously chaotic. Under previous leadership, America has been dragged into endless wars with false promises of transforming oppressive regimes into democratic havens. The left, with its globalist tendencies, is quick to support interventions that leave behind a trail of destruction, chaos, and American lives lost. Trump understands that the path to peace and prosperity is not paved with more conflict but with smart strategies that fortify American interests first.
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump says he does NOT want regime change in Iran.
"No, I don't want it. I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible. Regime change makes chaos."
"And ideally, we don't want to see so much chaos. So we'll see how it goes."
"You know, the… pic.twitter.com/AugM5hec7G
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 24, 2025
Iran deserves the chance to rebuild itself without the added instability of an externally imposed regime change. The Iranian people are resilient and industrious, capable of reclaiming their nation’s greatness if allowed to pursue their own path. Our meddling must not disrupt their potential for self-made success. This is the key difference between Trump’s vision and the failed approaches of liberal ideologues. The latter focus on feel-good policies without considering the lasting damage.
Of course, the possibility of the Iranian populace rallying against the regime is an appealing one. A homegrown uprising would be the ideal scenario. But let’s face it—this ideological battlefield is far from simple. Give the Iranian people the tools, not the force, and real change might happen. Yet, the mantras of liberal circles often ignore this, too fixated on quick fixes and surface-level solutions. They gamble with our future and security with reckless experiments.
Maybe it’s time to ask why anyone would trust the liberal camp to handle these delicate global issues. As tensions between Israel and Iran simmer, Trump’s clear message is not one of war but of wise caution. Does anyone else see that what seems radical now—the path of restraint and prudence—is what truly represents America’s strength?
