Staff Reports
Republicans in the Senate have hit a snag in the ongoing battle over Ukraine funding, with some eyeing cuts to the nonmilitary parts of the aid package. President Joe Biden requested a whopping $106 billion in funding last fall, with a large chunk of it earmarked for Ukraine, as well as for Israel and Taiwan. The funding is targeted at security assistance, but also includes nonlethal aid.
The Senate Appropriations Committee’s legislation, released in December, details $12 billion in direct budget support for Ukraine, plus $2 billion in economic assistance, and an additional $10 billion for humanitarian aid in Ukraine, Gaza, and other areas. However, conservative members of the Senate are looking to trim down the non-military portions of the aid, raising concerns about the size of the bill.
Read "Ukraine funding runs into new Senate roadblock over nonlethal aid' on SmartNews: https://t.co/lmca2uTsAh
— Posicho (@Posicho) January 24, 2024
Senate Minority Whip, Sen. John Thune, expressed a desire to pare back the non-military funding, focusing on the importance of discussions around aid that doesn’t involve lethal or military support. This move by Republicans is seen as a way to exert pressure and leverage in negotiations, particularly in light of the record influx of immigrants at the border, which has been a contentious issue for the GOP.
The disagreement over the Ukraine funding adds another layer to the already contentious legislative process. Democrats are questioning the wisdom of cutting nonlethal assistance, emphasizing the importance of maintaining basic services and infrastructure in Ukraine. They argue that reducing nonlethal aid would be short-sighted and detrimental to Ukraine’s operational needs.
While some Republicans are open to paring back assistance to Ukraine, there is a recognition of the potential catastrophic consequences of completely removing aid. This demonstrates a nuanced approach within the Republican Party, with various senators expressing differing levels of support for the aid package.
Furthermore, the debate over Ukraine funding is intertwined with negotiations on border policy changes. Senate Republicans have made it clear that they will not support further Ukraine funding without meaningful border policy reforms. This link between Ukraine aid and immigration policy highlights the complex and interconnected nature of legislative negotiations.
Overall, the push to reduce nonmilitary portions of the Ukraine aid reflects a broader conservative stance on fiscal responsibility and leverage in negotiations. The ongoing discussions and disagreements underscore the challenges faced in navigating complex legislative issues, as both parties seek to advance their respective agendas.
