Staff Reports
Jack Smith, the so-called special counsel who has taken it upon himself to target Donald Trump, has just been dealt a major blow by Judge Aileen Cannon of Florida. Cannon ruled that Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, effectively rendering his attempts to prosecute Trump moot. In simpler terms, Smith’s grand plans to take down Trump just went up in smoke. Classic case of “Not so fast, buddy.”
Smith once orchestrated an FBI raid on the former president’s home, rummaging through personal spaces like an uninvited guest at a yard sale. He seemed to think this would send a clear message about his power. But instead, it turned into an elaborate circus act, featuring the prosecutor who took “playing tough” to a new level—conduct unbecoming for someone in his position, to say the least.
As the 2024 election approaches, Special Counsel Jack Smith files a superseding indictment against Trump in the J6 DC case.
The alleged charges remain the same – Smith removes allegations covered under Executive privilege, such as efforts to influence the Justice Department. pic.twitter.com/QaOPC816s7
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) August 27, 2024
Despite the Supreme Court slapping him down regarding presidential immunity, Smith is back at it again, reinventing legal arguments like a bad magician pulling increasingly desperate rabbits out of his hat. His latest theatrical performance involves indicting Trump right before the 2024 election. The rationale? He wants to demonstrate that Trump’s supposed interference in the 2020 election was wrong. It sounds more like an episode from a legal drama than an actual court case, and it’s dripping with hypocritical audacity.
In the latest round, Smith has switched gears, naming Trump’s aides and lawyers as co-conspirators rather than official government personnel. It appears he’s willing to chase shadows in a desperate attempt to keep his mission alive. This isn’t about justice; it’s about weaponizing the legal system to take out political rivals, a tactic borrowed straight from the Democrats’ playbook. After all, the persistent drumbeat of “Get Trump” has continued to echo since he declared his intent to run for re-election.
Meanwhile, the Democrats have changed election laws at breakneck speed, all in the name of COVID. The chaotic results from hastily enacted changes and questionable voting practices raise plenty of eyebrows. Even moderate observers would argue that something smells fishy—especially in battleground states like Pennsylvania. Ironically, Smith wants to frame Trump’s complaints about the election as “nefarious” when many Americans believe that the election was indeed compromised, not by Trump, but by the very leaders who are now calling foul.
Adding to the circus, even Mark Zuckerberg admitted to censoring political opposition on behalf of the Biden camp. If Smith is truly on a quest for election integrity, why isn’t he knocking on Zuckerberg’s door? The irony here is thick enough to cut with a knife—while Trump is faced with charges, the person who actually interfered and manipulated the narrative behind the scenes seemingly walks away scot free.
In the end, all the legal theatrics from Jack Smith only serve to illuminate a severe lack of ethics by those in power. Timing matters, and the fact that Smith decided to unveil this indictment so close to the election is not just suspicious; it is a blatant attempt to influence the electoral outcome. Rather than uphold justice, he amplifies a rather old saying: two wrongs definitely don’t make a right, but in Smith’s case, it seems to be all in a day’s work.
