Kamala Harris took to the airwaves this week for an interview with Howard Stern, continuing her streak of cozying up to friendly faces in media instead of facing tougher questions elsewhere. Once a shock jock known for challenging the status quo, Stern has now settled into the role of a compliant ally to the establishment. It’s a departure from his early days of causing a ruckus and asking the questions no one else dared ask. That Harris would choose to appear on his show speaks volumes about her campaign’s inability to withstand real scrutiny.
Her prior attempt at a public engagement on “The View” had already gone south, with Harris essentially admitting to a policy of business as usual under the Biden administration. Instead of delivering fresh ideas or even a semblance of accountability, she merely echoed her boss’s lackluster approach. So, why would anyone expect more from her Stern appearance? It didn’t take long for this interview to devolve into a glorified pep rally for the vice president rather than an actual interrogation of her positions and policies.
Kamala Harris on Howard Stern: "Trump's Weakness"?
(BONUS: Watch both videos to learn what a sick freak Howard Stern is.)
Let's Break It Down!
Kamala Harris had the audacity to call Donald Trump weak on Howard Stern? Here's why that's not just ironic but outright laughable:… pic.twitter.com/riYMelmQui
— Thomas Paine Band (@ThomasPaineBand) October 8, 2024
During the interview, Stern made it crystal clear he was there to support Harris, abandoning any pretense of journalistic integrity. His opening gambit, questioning whether she took a nap, symbolizes a complete sidestepping of serious electoral issues. Instead of discussing the myriad challenges facing America, including inflation, crime, and security, he was more interested in her thoughts on a decades-old Prince soundtrack from the “Batman” movie. This is the new normal in political discourse on the left—lightweight banter instead of the heavy lifting required to address the nation’s pressing problems.
Stern didn’t hold back on his disdain for Trump and his supporters, echoing a familiar refrain among the liberal elite. He went so far as to ask if Harris would flee the country in the event of a Trump victory, a ridiculous notion that somehow made it onto airwaves while the real issues remained unaddressed. The irony of Stern, who boasts about his ties to the entertainment world, labeling Harris a “law and order candidate” only highlights the absurdity of her tenure thus far. After all, this is a woman who actively criticized law enforcement and promoted measures that fueled unrest under the guise of social justice advocacy.
Perhaps the most astonishing moment came when Harris dared to label Trump as “weak.” In a moment of stunning spunk, she proclaimed an election defined by strength versus weakness. Yet, her track record tells a different story, one of failure and avoidance. Harris has shunned hard-hitting interviews, dodged questions, and her record in office lacks any semblance of strength or capability. This is the politician who infamously mishandled border security, let countless individuals cross the border illegally, and neglected America’s interests abroad. Her recent dismissal of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in a key moment demonstrates not just a lack of diplomatic strength but a keen awareness of the electoral risks she faces.
While she spews rhetoric about making America secure, her legislation has directly contributed to soaring inflation rates and rocketing living costs. Harris’s complaints about national security ring hollow, considering her own actions that contradict the very strength she claims Trump lacks. Meanwhile, Trump demonstrated genuine courage and resolve during crises, showcasing leadership that Harris, despite her best efforts, simply cannot match. When reflecting on both figures, the contrast couldn’t be clearer: one embodies courage and resilience while the other encapsulates the very weakness she claims to abhor.
It’s time for a reality check. Harris needs to be held accountable for her failures instead of receiving the softball treatment from show hosts who have lost their way. The American people deserve better than platitudes and empty promises from someone who has proven more adept at dodging accountability than delivering on the needs of the nation. The upcoming election is more than just a contest between candidates; it’s a pivotal moment to reject the status quo represented by Harris and her ilk.