Staff Reports
The Kamala Harris campaign is apparently in deeper financial trouble than a fish out of water, sporting a jaw-dropping $20 million debt despite raking in over $1 billion during their attempt to climb the political ladder. This extravagant orgy of spending has left many scratching their heads as to how they managed to sink their ship faster than a lead balloon. It seems concerts and celebrity appearances were prioritized over actual voters, setting a new standard for campaign mismanagement.
As the campaign limps along into the red, it’s practically a comedy show for those with a pulse on the debacle that is Harris’s political career. As reported, the campaign blew through the funds like a kid in a candy store, hanging out with A-listers instead of worrying about swing states. The grand total went up in flames within a mere 100 days, equating to a blazing trail of cash that surely has the campaign staff wondering how they’ll cover their next meal, let alone their paychecks.
Adding a nice cherry on top of this financial fiasco is none other than Donald Trump, who has, in classic fashion, decided to troll the Harris campaign. In a surprising twist, the president-elect has offered to use his leftover funds to clear the debt of the struggling campaign and the associated DNC. While this might seem like a benevolent gesture, anyone following Trump knows it’s just another headline-grabbing moment where he showcases the contrast between his prudent strategies and Harris’s extravagance.
Trump Delivered a Classic Response to Reports About Kamala's Debt-Ridden Campaignhttps://t.co/IFtiLTPGsS
— vannschaffner (@vannschaffner) November 11, 2024
Careful scrutiny reveals the comically poor financial choices made by the Harris campaign. A whopping six figures were spent on building a set for the “Call Her Daddy” podcast, and a cool $1 million was forked over for a cameo from the one and only Oprah Winfrey. So, while the campaign was busy throwing millions around for celebrity endorsements, they found themselves staring down the barrel of unpaid staff and vendors, inevitably questioning their investment choices. One has to wonder if there were any headspins in the making over how it all went so sideways.
At the end of the day, this sorry saga showcases yet again that throwing money at problems doesn’t fix a lack of genuine political appeal. Harris’s campaign spent a billion-dollar budget like it was Monopoly money, and with no victories to show for it, they essentially provided a masterclass on how to fail spectacularly. It appears that rather than learning from their mistakes, they opted for glitz and glamour, ultimately illustrating that no amount of glitter can mask a candidate’s ineptitude.
