The Vice President recently took the stage to cast a cloud of doubt over the upcoming elections in November. In a performance reminiscent of a game show contestant trying to dodge the obvious, Kamala Harris questioned whether the election would genuinely be “free and fair.” This is quite the circus act considering her previous criticisms of those who dared to question the legitimacy of Joe Biden’s 2020 win. Apparently, when it’s her party’s turn, all bets are off.
During an odd exchange with Charlamagne tha God, a figure known for making waves, Harris found herself parrying questions about the election’s integrity. Rather than providing straightforward answers, she danced around whether she’d support the certification of a Trump win, countering with a vague reminder that democracy needs “the American people” to come together as if she were promoting social cohesion at a summer BBQ. It’s always amusing to see the Democrats’ mantra of “investment in democracy” boil down to crowd participation and feel-good platitudes amidst a political roller coaster.
Dems always accuse our side of what they're guilty of doing Kamala Harris Casts Doubt on Whether Election Will Be ‘Free and Fair‘ https://t.co/F6SAhTRpvA via @BreitbartNews
— Patriotic 🇺🇸Suzanne⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@suzost) October 16, 2024
Harris’s insistence that the electoral process hinges on the American people “standing up for that” sounds suspiciously like a plea for passive spectators to become active players in the game of democracy—as if people are merely waiting for a cue from their governmental game show host. The Vice President ventured into a metaphorical rabbit hole, bringing up the protection of “individual rights and liberties,” as if those supposed rights aren’t often the first victims of progressive policies. Anyone listening would have likely found themselves wondering how this convoluted reasoning would play out in a classroom for aspiring politicians.
As the theatrics continued, top congressional Democrats exhibited a delightful level of hypocrisy. Some have outright refused to commit to certifying the outcome of the 2024 election if Trump secures a victory. This comes despite their previous barking about the sanctity of the democratic process, proving once again that selective ethics are alive and well within the party. One must wonder how they reconcile this apparent double standard; it’s akin to a child denying they swiped the last cookie from the jar while cookie crumbs cover their guilty hands.
In a time when the Left preaches accountability, these high-profile Democrats, including Jamie Raskin, are shunning commitment with the grace of a tap-dancing bear. The refusal to respect the will of the voters if it swings in favor of the big orange one only amplifies the suspicion that they may only champion fair elections when they’re winning. Yet here we are, with Kamala Harris leading the charge in a political opera where the narrative constantly shifts based on who’s in the limelight, and it seems her version of democracy continues to be the same old three-ring circus.