Staff Reports
Kamala Harris has made headlines again, and as usual, it isn’t for any positive reasons. Her recent decision to snub Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro in favor of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is being interpreted as a monumental misstep that leaves many questioning her judgment. For an aspiring vice president, the choice of running mate is crucial, especially when trying to secure a state that is pivotal for any Democratic hopes in 2024. The blunders keep stacking up for the Harris camp.
Walz, with a plethora of baggage that evokes images of far-left policies and progressive failures, might seem like a poor pick. Those familiar with the situation have noted that Shapiro would have bolstered Harris’ chances precisely because he appeals to moderates. Yet, it appears the radical left’s influence is so strong that solidarity with leftist values has taken precedence over actual electability in Pennsylvania. Democrats seem to believe that as long as they stick with their comrades on the far left, everything else is irrelevant—an approach that the average Pennsylvania voter may not appreciate.
Report: What Happened With Harris' Shapiro Interview and Why It All Went South https://t.co/bWyBNfZtVC
— DLW 🔥#MAGA (@Dlw20161950) August 6, 2024
Following the Harris-Shapiro interview, reports indicate that the Governor’s performance was perceived as showboating by her team, leading to a decision that now looks questionable. One must wonder why Harris would overlook Shapiro’s evident strengths while opting for Walz, a leader with unremarkable popularity in his state. As the reality of her choice begins to settle in, it becomes clearer that Harris’ honeymoon phase is all but over. The pessimistic outlook surrounding this choice could derail any momentum she thought she had.
The aftermath of the interview reveals a lack of enthusiasm from Shapiro’s team—hardly a ringing endorsement for a vice presidential candidate. His admission of wrestling with the decision to trade the governorship for the vice presidency added another layer of uncertainty. Indications suggest he might be trying to cast his involvement as a voluntary exit strategy from a tumultuous alliance with Harris. If Shapiro thought that teaming up with Harris could jeopardize his future ambitions—especially given her shaky track record—it’s no surprise he might have been hesitant about potentially tying his leadership reputation to hers.
This situation raises important questions about Harris’ broader strategy: is she trying to distance herself from Shapiro while conciliating the progressive faction? If she’s on her way to a significant electoral defeat, the optics couldn’t be worse for Shapiro. His decision to step away now allows him to maintain national visibility while dissociating himself from impending doom, reflecting a cautious approach to a future that undoubtedly includes aspirations beyond 2024. If he indeed shunned Harris, it represents a savvy play in the face of a sinking ship.
Moreover, this predicament does little to bolster Harris’ image within the Jewish community. If she intended to shake off suggestions of antisemitism by cozying up to Shapiro, it appears to have backfired spectacularly. The pick of Walz, who carries leftist baggage almost as heavy as Harris herself, coordinates poorly with what should have been a deft political maneuvering.
All in all, this debacle serves as an early warning to Harris: her quest for the vice presidency is off to a rocky start, and it is likely to become more chaotic. Given her track record, one can only imagine how much more embarrassing this saga can become as the campaign progresses.
