Staff Reports
Kamala Harris, despite her seasoned political background, appears to have opted for a rather dubious tactic in her bid for re-election: leveraging a network of misleading news outlets to distort political reality in her favor. Over the past few days, Harris’ campaign pulled a classic move by touting an endorsement from a dubious source named “The Keystone Newsroom.” This outlet, which is part of a larger strategy funded by the likes of George Soros, raises eyebrows more than it garners credible support.
The premise behind such manipulative tactics is simple but telling. By fabricating a narrative that Polish Pennsylvanians have thrown their support behind her—based on a flimsy claim tied to a letter from four Democrat politicians—Harris hopes to sway local voters who might trust regional news more than national media. The insidious underbelly is clear: these so-called endorsements are not grassroots support but rather orchestrated campaigns designed to give the illusion of widespread approval. The entire exercise reeks of desperation, as her campaign appears to be drowning in a sea of untruths.
Kamala's campaign is using fake news headlines from a liberal dark money funded organization that does political work on behalf of Democrats by operating phony news outlets.
Here's how Soros funded propaganda moves in real time:
Earlier today, Kamala HQ and Kamala Wins posted a… pic.twitter.com/maaFEGMwYX
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) September 24, 2024
This isn’t an isolated incident; it reflects broader patterns of deceit within Harris’ political strategy. The campaign operates under a facade that promotes a carefully curated narrative which, in the eyes of many conservatives, is nothing more than a house of cards. The also-called “Courier Newsroom,” funded by dark money, serves as a breeding ground for these misleading stories, using local clout as a veneer of authenticity. Behind the curtains, the mechanics of these operation expose how far Harris’ campaign is willing to go to paint a rosy picture of support that clearly does not exist.
One has to question the integrity of a campaign that resorts to such manipulative measures. It suggests a lack of confidence in Harris’ appeal among voters. A legitimate campaign that feels assured about its prospects would rely on authentic endorsements and organic support mechanisms, not phony news outlets to prop up its image. Instead, Harris seems intent on fooling both voters and pundits alike with deceptive headlines that only serve to undermine public trust further.
Where is the outrage from the mainstream media that so vehemently declares itself the guardian against misinformation? Outlets like CNN and MSNBC preach about the dangers of false narratives, yet they conveniently turn a blind eye when the very political figures they tend to favor indulge in such misrepresentation. The hypocrisy is staggering. This double standard demonstrates that their supposed crusade against misinformation is less about protecting democracy and more about promoting their preferred political outcomes. Voters deserve the truth, not a manufactured narrative crafted through underhanded tactics.
The dismal tactics employed by Harris underscore the larger issues at play in the political arena, where fabricating endorsements is simply part of the game rather than an anomaly. In a time when genuine engagement and authentic support should reign supreme, her campaign’s antics are a disheartening reminder of the lengths some politicians will go to in an attempt to clutch onto power. The coming election will tell if this approach resonates or repulses the very constituents Harris is trying to fool.
