Staff Reports
CNN continues its descent into the depths of absurdity, showcasing how the mainstream media panics at the thought of President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk tackling government inefficiency. On one such spectacle, Scott Jennings took center stage on “CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip,” schooling the panel on the real crises bubbling under the surface, which mostly involve Democrats trying to undermine the president’s authority in every conceivable way.
Jennings took aim at the Democrats’ so-called strategy, which consists of hostile attorney generals scrambling to nullify the last election by hunting down the most extreme district court judges they can find. The far-left operatives throw spaghetti at the wall, hoping something sticks to delay Trump’s initiatives and revert progress. Meanwhile, they seem perfectly comfortable disregarding the electoral process, showcasing a brand of political theatrics that is more farcical than functional.
Nick Akerman, a former prosecutor with a pedigree that includes tenure at Watergate, attempted to lend an air of seriousness to the debate regarding Musk’s involvement with the freshly minted Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). His arguments revolved around the sanctity of personal data and the potential for disaster when individuals who understand little about data systems attempt to wield such power. Jennings, however, countered Akerman’s fears by pointing out that Akerman’s skepticism about Musk’s abilities seems more rooted in personal bias than in a genuine concern for governance.
The real superhero of the night was Jennings, who managed to keep the conversation on track, challenging claims made by his liberal counterparts about the legitimate authority of a duly elected president. It becomes clear that for the left, elections are little more than a speed bump on the road to maintaining power, as they signal a willingness to challenge the very legitimacy of a government based on the results of a free and fair election.
Scott Jennings Continues to Expose Liberal Talking Points Against Trump https://t.co/I7neR6HQ36
— Observing Time (@TimeObserving) February 13, 2025
The discussion shifted gears, landing on the ongoing situation in Gaza, where Jennings deftly maneuvered to remind his fellow panelists that Hamas bears the initial responsibility for the current crisis. When liberal voices attempted to assign blame to Israel, Jennings countered with irrefutable facts about the unprovoked attacks on October 7. It became a battle of reason versus rhetoric, with Jennings making the indisputable point that Hamas’s actions set the stage for the ongoing violence—while his opponents seemed far more interested in spinning narratives than acknowledging reality.
Despite the bleating from the left, Jennings defended the need for Trump’s leadership during this tense time, emphasizing that the focus should be on bringing attention back to the root of the conflict: the violent aggression of Hamas. His confidence shone through as he reiterated the need for stable diplomacy in the region, showing that when it comes to discussing Israel and its right to defend itself, the facts reside firmly on the side of truth, while the left appears more enamored with trying to rewrite history. An uncanny ability to bring clarity to muddled discussion ultimately left the liberal panelists scrambling to respond, often resorting to deflection rather than engaging with the actual issues at hand.
