Staff Reports
Senator J.D. Vance’s recent comments about Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s VP aspirations reveal a sharp critique of a candidate who has seemingly sidestepped military service obligations. Vance, who served as a Marine and knows a thing or two about duty, took it upon himself to highlight Walz’s past military propriety—or lack thereof—during a campaign event. It seems that while Walz was busy plotting his congressional career, he allegedly left his battalion stranded just as they were preparing for deployment to Iraq in 2005. Talk about a real-life case of “what’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is also mine”—only this time, it’s soldiers left behind.
As Senator Vance passionately pointed out, Walz’s excuse for jumping ship on his military commitment was flimsy at best. Two retired sergeant majors brought some interesting historical context back into the light, alleging that Walz’s claims regarding his military retirement were not only misleading but outright false. According to their recollections, he could have sought permission from the Secretary of Defense to run for office while still serving. Instead, it seems Walz decided on an early retirement, leaving his soldiers to face the music without their commander. If that’s not a textbook case of “stolen valor,” then someone should crack open the dictionary.
JD Vance Takes The Gloves Off, RIPS Tim Walz For Abandoning His Men Before Deployment
— Proud Elephant 🇺🇸🦅 (@ProudElephantUS) August 7, 2024
In a no-holds-barred indictment of Walz’s character, Vance expressed his discontent with a man who seemingly put personal ambitions ahead of patriotic duty during a time when the nation was in the throes of war. Vance questioned the honor of someone who’d set the stage for their team’s deployment only to bail out at the last minute. It’s one thing to serve behind a desk in a cushy office and another to stay true to the call of duty. For those who serve, their commitment doesn’t come with a side of convenience.
Further adding to the intrigue is the fact that Walz’s political history isn’t a shining beacon of pro-Second Amendment sentiment either. Past videos have surfaced wherein he criticized the same “weapons of war” that he once wielded during his military service. It appears his ideological position on gun control is as slippery as his military commitments. Nothing screams loyalty to the troops quite like talking out of both sides of your mouth.
To top it off, questions are swirling around Vice President Kamala Harris for choosing Walz as her running mate. Critics, including Republican analysts, suggest this move is a tacit admission of the limitations within the Democratic Party. Apparently, choosing a candidate from a crucial swing state like Pennsylvania would have been too straightforward; instead, Walz’s selection hints at deeper issues, such as antisemitism within the party, which makes one wonder if a ride on the Democratic struggle bus is necessary for every election season. As the drama unfolds, it’s clear that Walz’s military history and political moves are under scrutiny, making it increasingly apparent that they may have sunk his aspirations for a vice-presidential bid.
