Staff Reports
The infamous “Muslim Ban,” that grievance the left never tires of raising, is headed for a comeback, and unsurprisingly, the liberal media is already in meltdown mode. During Trump’s first term, Democrats, along with their media puppets, labeled this security measure as a racist initiative aimed at keeping innocent Muslims out of the United States—a narrative so exaggerated it made a soap opera look like a documentary. The irony here is thick: this so-called ban was never a blanket Muslim exclusion. A quick peek at its actual provisions reveals that it was all about ensuring national security.
Recent reports indicate that Trump, with his characteristic boldness, intends to reimplement what he affectionately called his “famous Travel Ban” in anticipation of a second term. According to Todd Bensman from the Center for Immigration Studies, this plan is a breath of fresh air considering current realities that make such a precaution a necessity. The original ban targeted 13 countries, including notorious hotspots like Iran, Libya, Somalia, and Syria, while also including non-Muslim countries like North Korea and Burma. Clearly, this wasn’t about religion; it was about the lack of reliable information from these nations regarding potential travelers—a fact that would make any reasonable person suspicious.
Trump Never Imposed a ‘Muslim Ban,’ and It’s Coming Back –
https://t.co/sd17Or57pk pic.twitter.com/AUz8L26K47— Robert Spencer (@jihadwatchRS) November 19, 2024
A detailed look reveals that some countries were less likely to provide adequate information about those seeking entry into the U.S. This is not merely a theoretical concern—there is a notable history of violence linked to individuals from these countries. For instance, just before Trump instituted his travel restrictions, a Somali-born jihadist committed a brutal attack at Ohio State University, injuring multiple students. And this wasn’t an isolated incident; there’s a litany of similar events that speak to the chaotic consequences of unchecked immigration policies favored by the left.
The left’s impulse to dismiss any discussion of security as “racist” is not only absurd but also incredibly dangerous. When examining the evidence of failed refugee policies in Europe, it’s clear that many violent incidents could have been prevented with more stringent measures in place. It’s a hard reality that those pushing for more lenient immigration policies seem wholly unconcerned about the implications for American citizens. They sidestep the realities faced by ordinary Americans, preferring instead to indulge in moral preening while ignoring the fallout of their decisions.
As Trump prepares to take the helm once more, it is likely he will remind Americans of the benefits of a cautious immigration strategy through the reinstatement of the travel ban. Predictably, the left will respond with theatrical outrage, employing every weapon in their arsenal to undermine common-sense security measures once again. If history has shown anything, it’s that the louder they scream, the clearer it becomes that they have no viable alternative to offer. The truth is that the safety of the nation should always come first, regardless of how upset it makes the out-of-touch left.
