Staff Reports
It’s clear that President Joe Biden has been caught somewhat unprepared for an unexpected endgame during his term. With a mere six months left in office, he finds himself scrambling to safeguard the legacy he thought he’d be proudly showcasing ahead of a potential reelection campaign. Up until recently, Biden seemed to exude confidence about facing off against former President Donald Trump again, believing that his party’s support would rally around him.
However, the political landscape has shifted dramatically. While Vice President Kamala Harris has been riding a wave of enthusiasm following her announcement of radical left-wing Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate, it’s becoming increasingly evident that the Biden administration is in full panic mode. The fear is palpable: should Trump make a triumphant return to the White House, he could very well dismantle everything that Biden’s administration has touched, sending the government back to a more sensible state.
Washington Examiner: Wake up with the Washington Examiner: Biden tries to protect science, and three things to know about last night’s primaries https://t.co/v3yRk6RlN5
— Ian’s Newsfeed 🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@IanHNewsFeed) August 7, 2024
Biden and his cohort are rushing to put protective measures in place to insulate various employees and governmental functions in anticipation of a possible Trump presidency. Recent reports have highlighted how efforts are underway to “Trump-proof” scientific institutions, amid worries that a second Trump term could dismantle their operations entirely. The chaotic aftermath of 2020 is still fresh in everyone’s mind, and it seems that some scientists are understandably nervous about what that might entail for their careers and research.
Among the significant threats from a potential return of Trump is the much-maligned “Schedule F” classification. This is an executive order that would have enabled Trump to reclassify thousands of government employees, making them liable to immediate termination if they didn’t toe the line. While Biden quickly tossed out this order upon entering office, the ghost of it lingers, and the administration is racing to mitigate any chance of its resurrection. Scientists are voicing their fears about this potential upheaval, worried that their work could become collateral damage in the grip of political agendas geared towards interference.
On the lighter side of things, there are primary races igniting electoral fervor across the nation, which could heavily influence the political scene in the months to come. Missouri’s Rep. Cori Bush, a Squad member with a penchant for extreme leftism, found herself ousted in a primary contest against St. Louis County Prosecutor Wesley Bell. Bell’s victory signifies a welcome shift in Democratic leadership, one that prioritizes practical economic policies rather than Bush’s controversial anti-Israel stance.
Washington’s gubernatorial race offers a glimmer of hope for Republicans, with former Rep. Dave Reichert facing off against Attorney General Bob Ferguson, following the retirement of long-standing Democratic Governor Jay Inslee. Meanwhile, over in Michigan, the GOP’s ambitions are reignited as former Rep. Mike Rogers has outperformed the Republican primary competition, making the Senate race one to watch come November. Both Rogers and his Democratic opponent, Rep. Elissa Slotkin, can expect an engaging contest, especially as Rogers enters the matchup with substantial fundraising and name recognition.
With election season heating up, Republican opportunities are burgeoning across the nation. As the Biden administration works tirelessly to mask its perceived failures by “Trump-proofing” its legacy, the GOP is seizing the moment to capitalize on vulnerabilities and reposition itself for potential gains. The real question remains: will Biden’s frantic efforts be enough to safeguard his presidency or will it all unravel come election day? The drama continues to unfold, and, as always, the stakes couldn’t be higher.
