Staff Reports
The political theater surrounding the supposed scandals of the elite continues to unfold, with Democrats striving to keep the focus on former President Trump’s past misadventures. Yet, fresh allegations have emerged about current Vice President Kamala Harris that could throw the spotlight back on her own questionable history. Apparently, Harris’s romantic escapades rival her supposed political acumen, which many conservatives contend has yet to materialize.
Rumors of an affair between Kamala Harris and journalist Phil Bronstein, once married to actress Sharon Stone, have been circulating for two decades. While Bronstein prefers to keep his lips sealed on the matter like a good little Democrat, insiders claim they’ve spotted the duo on numerous occasions, hinting at a dating relationship that could make even the most casual observer raise an eyebrow. It seems that for anyone proclaiming that “it takes a village,” the VP may have had her own personal agenda with both her dating life and her former career pursuits.
Sharon Stone's ex-husband won't comment on alleged affair with Kamala Harris – Conservative Institute https://t.co/EACc6RaZhT
— Shadow of the Magi (@ShadowoftheMagi) August 7, 2024
Harris’s romantic history is no stranger to scandal, as her dalliance with former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown adds an interesting twist. While some may argue that age is just a number, it’s difficult to ignore the age difference between a then 30-year-old Harris and the 60-year-old Brown, who helped land her a plush job shortly after their affair began. Voters might want to think twice about the woman who has carved her political path through her relationships rather than traditional means, just as she now tries to carve up the political landscape.
Further complicating matters is the tangled web of relationships in the Harris-Emhoff household. Doug Emhoff, the Vice President’s husband, is not without his own scandalous history. During his first marriage, reports surfaced about an affair with the family nanny, who subsequently became pregnant—a plot straight out of a soap opera that would make even the most jaded Democrat cringe. Though Emhoff claims to have “taken responsibility,” it poses serious questions about the moral fabric of those in high office.
It’s hard not to chuckle when considering how this gross hypocrisy will likely play out. Many Democrats have wasted no time vilifying Trump on the past, but suddenly, with Harris in the hot seat, there’s an uncanny silence. While they’ve sought to paint the former President’s alleged escapades as sinful, their supposed leaders are busy pulling the same stunts, raising the stakes in a high-stakes game of political chess. With such captivating drama unfolding, one might wonder if the next campaign strategy will include less focus on policy and more on tabloid headlines.
As the left grapples with these allegations, it seems only fair that scrutiny be applied evenly. If hypocrisy were currency, the Democrats would be rolling in riches, while conservatives are left questioning how many more scandals will be swept under the rug—if this much-discussed and ever-present “party of the people” can’t even keep it together themselves.
