Staff Reports
A tangled web of non-profit organizations, often backed by government funds, is increasingly involved in resettling refugees, with critics pointing fingers at the Biden administration for making an already messy situation even worse. The migrant crisis has become hard to ignore as towns across America—from the suburbs of Springfield, Ohio, to the scenic streets of Aurora, Colorado—find themselves inundated with waves of migrants. The once clear lines between government agencies and non-profits are now blurred, with the latter gaining prominence under Biden-Harris policies.
Experts are quick to point out that the administration’s approach to immigration has only fueled the fire. Proponents of tougher immigration measures argue that the Biden team’s border policies have turned NGOs into beneficiaries of a system riddled with complications. Observers note that federal spending on immigration-related loans, grants, and contracts has soared nearly tenfold since 2020, leading to a bonanza for groups eager to cash in on the chaos they claim to manage. Those familiar with the inner workings of this system observe that it’s become a lucrative business for these organizations.
Thanks to @RCInvestigates for linking to my latest piece!
"A web of NGOs is collaborating with government agencies to facilitate the resettlement of refugees – and Biden-Harris policies have only exacerbated the migrant crisis, sources told the Caller." pic.twitter.com/KF0GkW5UoV
— Eireann (Erin) Van Natta🇺🇸 (@evannatta1776) October 2, 2024
Biden’s Welcome Corps program, touted as an innovative step forward in refugee sponsorship, allows groups of five or more private individuals to select whom they want to sponsor. While this may sound like a wholesome community effort, many see it as an unsettling move that essentially turns the refugee resettlement process into a popularity contest. Critics believe that private citizens should not have the power to choose future American citizens, especially when partnered with government entities like the State Department and organizations that have essentially made a cottage industry out of facilitating immigration.
What’s particularly eyebrow-raising is the way these NGOs, some of which are heavily funded by taxpayer dollars, operate without any accountability. Take the case of the Vera Institute for Justice, which has apparently found a comfortable niche representing illegal immigrants in court while also advocating for policies that would keep the flow of newcomers coming. Many are left wondering who benefits from this arrangement—taxpayers or non-profit executives sailing smoothly on the waves of government grants. It seems the cycle is self-perpetuating, with more regulations leading to more federal funding, creating a situation that appears almost designed to perpetuate itself.
Cities like Lancaster, Pennsylvania, have reportedly donned the title of “America’s refugee capital,” riding the coattails of the administration’s resettlement efforts. However, some local organizations, such as Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio, adamantly state they are not responsible for bringing migrants to their areas, a claim that does little to assuage community concerns. Instead, numerous reports highlight rising rent prices and stretched local resources, leaving residents wondering just who is pulling the strings in this saga of immigration.
At the heart of the issue lies the daunting task of navigating the labyrinth of immigrant policies, especially with tools like the CBP One app, which some say has become a ticket for expedited access to the U.S. instead of its initial purpose of scheduling appointments. Observers argue that this blend of technology and policy has made illegal immigration easier than ever. Perpetuated by a lackadaisical enforcement strategy, this approach fosters the notion that the U.S. can no longer maintain control over its own borders with any semblance of decency or common sense.
All these elements combined create a disconcerting picture. Many fret that as long as NGOs remain entrenched in the resettlement process while receiving government backing, solutions to the migrant crisis will remain as elusive as a runaway politician. As conditions worsen in towns and cities across the country, the question remains: how much longer can this system continue before there are consequences for the chaos it has sown?
