The political theater surrounding Kamala Harris is reaching a spectacular crescendo, highlighting serious misgivings about the prospects of her running for president in 2024. Despite not receiving a single vote in the primary elections, Harris is tentatively positioned as the Democratic nominee, leading some to suggest that the party is opting for a secretive selection rather than an open contest. This situation raises eyebrows, especially from a party that claims to champion democracy while simultaneously undermining it with backroom deals and orchestrated shuffles.
It has become abundantly clear that Kamala Harris is not only unpopular among the electorate but also lacks the necessary strength to take on formidable opponents like Donald Trump. Polling data suggests that her approval ratings trail behind the former president’s, which is an uncomfortable reality for a party that relies heavily on image and perception. Moreover, Harris is closely linked to the Biden administration’s less-than-stellar performance on critical issues, including the border crisis—a responsibility Biden specifically assigned to her, which she has largely avoided.
Her tenure as vice president has been riddled with instability, marked especially by her surprisingly high staff turnover. As reports emerge detailing the dismal conditions within her office, it is evident that the morale among aides is low and that Harris has difficulty maintaining a cohesive team. With nearly half of her original staff having left, questions abound regarding her leadership style. It’s alarming that someone seeking the nation’s highest office is struggling so notably to manage her immediate team, which serves as a grim precursor for any broader political ambitions.
The troubling details don’t stop there. Former aides describe Harris as setting lofty expectations that some staff members found impossible to meet, leading to what can only be interpreted as a hostile work environment—an environment so toxic that it has become reminiscent of a courtroom with her playing the role of a relentless prosecutor. Her well-documented discomfort with unscripted public appearances raises major concerns. Even for a former senator who should be accustomed to public scrutiny, it appears that Harris goes to great lengths to avoid events that lack tight controls and meticulously organized parameters.
Report: Damaging Details Leak About Some of Kamala's Problems and What Biden Really Thinks https://t.co/DRznXb3jRQ
— PatPeters,PhD. (@PatVPeters) July 23, 2024
Perhaps most concerning is the revelation that Harris had to run mock dinner scenarios with her staff in preparation for attending actual events. This level of anxiety is astonishing for someone aiming to be president. In a world where diplomacy and crisis response are the order of the day, the need for practice runs at dinner parties suggests a worrisome inability to handle the very public responsibilities of leadership. Voters deserve a leader who doesn’t fall apart under the bright lights of a charity dinner but instead thrives in the harsh spotlight of global scrutiny.
Ultimately, the narrative surrounding Kamala Harris is a troubling glimpse into the Democratic Party’s willingness to stick with a candidate who’s akin to doubling down on incoherence—following a president whose mental acuity is itself under question. Conservative Americans are rightly skeptical of a party that appears to prioritize control over competence, and the prospect of Harris as the nominee is a reflection of the desperate and contentious state of a party that seems increasingly out of touch with the public. As the dust settles, it leaves one wondering whether the Democrats can genuinely believe that such a leader could effectively represent the free world.