in

PG&E hides hikes in $24 Base Services Charge, Californians furious

California residents woke up to a surprise on their utility bills this spring: PG&E quietly reworked the way it charges customers. The utility’s new “Base Services Charge,” rolled out in March 2026, tucks important grid and delivery costs into a flat monthly fee — roughly $24 a month for most households — even as the per‑kWh price went down. Predictably, customers are furious, and with good reason: many people see higher final bills, not the relief they were promised.

What changed: the new Base Services Charge

PG&E says the billing move was driven by state policy (AB 205) and a desire to be “more transparent.” In plain English, that means some fixed grid and program costs are no longer wrapped into usage rates. Most customers now have a Base Services Charge near $24/month. Low‑income programs get smaller levels — about $6 for CARE and $12 for FERA. The charge is non‑bypassable, so even solar customers who send power back to the grid still see it on their bills.

Who wins and who loses

On paper, per‑kWh rates fell. In reality, lots of working families and homeowners pay more because the fixed monthly charge eats into any savings. Solar owners are especially steamed: they were promised near‑zero bills some months, and now they get hit with a steady fee just for using the grid. As Matthew Freedman of The Utility Reform Network put it, “PG&E is taking credit for something it didn’t really do.” Translation: a headline‑friendly rate cut, but sticker shock when the bill arrives.

Why bills are still rising — wildfire and fixed costs

Don’t blame only accounting tricks. Underlying costs matter. Wildfire mitigation, grid upgrades and liability have exploded costs across California’s utilities. Regulators and lawmakers have warned those expenses are “unsustainable” for ratepayers. That means even if generation rates fall, delivery and safety programs keep pushing bills up. Meanwhile, pending rate cases at the California Public Utilities Commission could change the math again, and the state is wrestling with how to fund wildfire defenses without turning residents into an unpaid insurance pool.

Politics and what’s next

Anger over bills is reviving old fights: calls for public power, expanded community choice, and tougher oversight of California’s utilities. Governor Gavin Newsom and the Legislature are watching, and the CPUC’s docket will matter a lot. For conservatives and consumers, the message is simple: demand accountability, defend families on fixed incomes, and don’t let “transparency” become shorthand for a new, permanent tax on electricity. Keep those bills handy and complain loudly — polite emails haven’t worked so far.

Written by Staff Reports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Rep. Byron Donalds: The Senate Sucks as SAVE Act Stalls

Rep. Byron Donalds: The Senate Sucks as SAVE Act Stalls

Markwayne Mullin to Dem lawmaker: ‘Don't point your finger at me’

Homeland Security Sec Mullin clashes Rep DeLauro over 450,000 kids