Staff Reports
Van Jones, CNN’s resident purveyor of progressive talking points and habitual gaslighter, has once again proven that the Democrat Party is as messy as it is out of touch. This time around, he’s aimed at Kamala Harris’s choice of Tim Walz as her running mate, suggesting that the pick is little more than pandering to the party’s hidden, darker elements—namely, the anti-Jewish bigots lurking in the shadows.
During a segment with Jim Acosta, another luminary of leftist drivel, Van Jones didn’t pull any punches. He argued that the selection of a decidedly mediocre Minnesota governor is an attempt to address the grievances of a voting bloc that feels neglected by the Biden administration. According to Jones, Muslims and Arabs are clamoring for representation, and Walz, for whatever reason, has been chosen to save the day over a more universally appealing candidate like Josh Shapiro, the Pennsylvania governor who has shone brightly in the party.
'The Darker Part of the Party': CNN's Van Jones Goes There, Says Walz Pick Is for 'Anti-Jewish Bigots'https://t.co/UyDfKYbpia
— RedState (@RedState) August 6, 2024
From a conservative standpoint, it’s hard to swallow the notion that anyone was apprehensive about Shapiro. In fact, rather than dreading his candidacy, many Republicans likely see Walz as a far easier target. With Shapiro’s credentials as a uniter of voters—Republicans and independents alike—one can only chuckle at the Democrats’ internal disputes that led to Walz’s selection. Watching them trip over themselves trying to appeal to various factions while rapidly losing touch with their core supporters is undoubtedly entertaining.
Jones’s comments took a fascinating turn as he began labeling Walz’s selection as a concession to the rise of anti-Semitism within the party. Here’s a man who knows all too well the undercurrents that run through his party, admitting that there is indeed a troubling blend of bigotry festering among some Democrats. The irony is rich, given that the Republican Party stands as the most reliable defender of Israel and the Jewish community. At the same time, the Democrats continue to cozy up to factions that don’t quite share the same affinity for the Jewish state.
The problem for Democrats is undeniable. On the one hand, they strive to engage with constituents who express concern over international issues, while on the other, they risk alienating their traditional allies. This balancing act is fraught with peril, and it’s clear that Walz was a miscalculated move meant to appease certain voting demographics without realizing the more significant implications. The party seems to be content to ignore the steadfast support for Israel and the Jewish people that resonates deeply within mainstream American conservatism.
In a political landscape where the GOP stands strong for its principles, the Democrats find themselves in a dilemma of their own making, scrambling to appease an increasingly diverse roster of voters while betraying their foundational allies. Van Jones may be right in calling out this dark side, but the true comedy lies in watching an already fractured party try to navigate these treacherous waters without capsizing.
