Staff Reports
In a recent turn of events, Tesla CEO Elon Musk decided to speak out against Tucker Carlson’s interview with Larry Sinclair, the alleged “gay lover” of former President Barack Obama. Musk criticized Carlson for not providing “objective evidence” and for allowing a convicted fraudster like Sinclair to make such claims without proper pushback. The New York Post reported Musk’s comments, stating that his support for the former Fox News host seemed to waver during this particular interview.
During the controversial interview, Sinclair boldly claimed to have engaged in a “night of crack cocaine-fueled sex” with Obama and even alleged that the former president had returned for more the following day. While the interview has generated a substantial amount of attention, garnering over 14 million views, many have questioned the validity of Sinclair’s claims.
Elon Musk took to X, previously known as Twitter, to express his skepticism regarding Sinclair’s allegations. He emphasized that any belief in these claims must be supported by objective evidence rather than the words of someone with a questionable past like Sinclair. Musk’s response clearly indicates his doubts about the veracity of Sinclair’s statements.
Ep. 22 Larry Sinclair says he had a night of crack cocaine-fueled sex with Barack Obama, and that Obama came back for more the next day. Assess for yourself. Here’s our interview. pic.twitter.com/R6CXwKv6gs
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) September 6, 2023
Sinclair has been repeating his claim for 15 years, asserting that he did not recognize Obama when they supposedly met in 1999. However, most experts have dismissed this claim as debunked. Sinclair detailed his alleged encounter with Obama, recalling how he provided money for drugs and witnessed Obama indulging in cocaine. Sinclair added, “It was definitely not Barack’s first time.” However, Sinclair’s credibility has been called into question due to his criminal history and numerous aliases.
While Sinclair’s past raises doubts about his credibility, it doesn’t necessarily mean that his claims are automatically false. Interestingly, Obama himself admitted to fantasizing about relationships with men in a letter to his girlfriend, as revealed by researcher David Garrow. This revelation further adds fuel to the fire, supporting Sinclair’s allegations to some extent. Moreover, Obama’s own brother, Malik Obama, publicly declared that the former president “must be gay.” These revelations and declarations highlight the importance of thoroughly scrutinizing Sinclair’s claims before drawing any firm conclusions.
As Musk rightly points out, in the absence of solid evidence, it is essential to approach these claims with skepticism and critical thinking. Whether Sinclair’s allegations hold any truth remains to be seen, but it is clear that the controversy surrounding Obama’s personal life continues to be a topic of interest and speculation.
